I’ll Bet On Jeff Janis Returning To Packers

5
Jeff Janis

Robby is going to be pissed that I’ve even suggested this. However, I have never quite been on the Jeff Janis bandwagon like he has.

Sure, I would have loved to see the guy get maybe, I don’t know… more than 49 offensive snaps in 2017. But Fat Mike isn’t that creative. His fat, gravy-filled head can’t conceive how to use more than three receivers, rotate guys, create matchup problems, run trick plays and so forth.

The most creative thing old Gravy Head has come up with in the past two years is the damn two-fullback set and the notion that, “Hell, I can just dip this dinner roll right into my ear.”

The fact is, I don’t know if Jeff Janis can play receiver. None of us do. We haven’t actually seen him get a chance to do so.

That makes Jeff Janis nothing more than a valuable special teamer. And don’t get me wrong, JJ is a valuable special teamer.

Consider that the Packers set a team record in net punting average two of the past three years. The first of those years was with that ginger, Tim Masthay, crappily striking the ball in 2015. The only reason he got that record was because of Jeff Janis, who, whatever he brings as a receiver, is exceptional in punt coverage.

Masthay’s net was 40.2, but his gross was just 43.9 and he hit just 18 of 81 punts inside the 20.

Vogel, a rookie, bested Masthay’s net mark at 41.6 in 2017. His gross was a more respectable 44.4 and he hit 19 of 71 inside the 20. Equally as importantly, Vogel hit just two into the endzone in 2017 and Masthay had six touchbacks in 2015.

In 2016, the Packers’ — or Big Ted’s — hand-selected replacement for that ginger fuck was Jake Schum, AKA Jake Bum. Guess what?

Janis was off as a gunner in 2016. He started the year injured and didn’t start to look like his old self until late in the campaign. Hence, Bum also got sent packing.

This isn’t all about how punters benefit from the presence of Jeff Janis, however. It’s also about Janis’ prospects in free agency.

Janis will be a free agent in March. The Packers obviously don’t see him as much more than a special teamer. The thing is, despite all of Robby’s well-placed propaganda (and let’s be honest, EXTENSIVE research), I don’t think the rest of the NFL thinks any differently.

I would highly doubt anyone is going to pay Janis to come in and compete at receiver. After four years and a total of 17 receptions for 200 yards — that simply isn’t a high-value target. It’s an afterthought target that signs with someone during the summer or just after the draft.

In which case, it makes Janis nothing more than a valuable special teams player… to the Packers. Much like Jarrett Bush was. Much like Chris Banjo was.

And that’s why I’m betting Janis is back with the Packers. Maybe for a couple million a year, simply for his value on special teams. Fat Mike will never use him at receiver.

And that’s just what it is. Besides, the guy just likes hunting in his backyard too much.

About The Author

Monty McMahon is one of the founders of Total Packers. He is probably the most famous graduate of UW-Oshkosh next to Jim Gantner.

5 Comments on "I’ll Bet On Jeff Janis Returning To Packers"

  1. Empacador

    I think many of us are resigned to the fact Janis isn’t ever gonna flourish or even be an afterthought in Green Bay. Yet they pretend Goodson is a DB and he’s done even less but still makes the team year after year. Maybe this is the year…

  2. MM²SUCK

    Great points Monty, like Rob, I have always advocated for Janis to get more of an opportunity than this Buffoon McCarthy has so far given him. Like they say, “you cannot teach speed” and Janis had that combined with height, strength and jumping ability. IMO, the Packers were smart to draft him with his “gifts” but shit the bed not designing plays to showcase and get him involved weekly and develop his natural gifts more for the betterment of the Packers.

    • Zwoeger

      No need to design plays even. He probably outrun anyone and cath the ball even looking back over his shoulder as we have seen ( can’t remember whitch game but I metioned it here).

  3. Bob

    After watching the replay of SB52 one thing kept catching my attention, Nick Foles in that game had seven different players catch the ball. It has been along time since AR has done this. When he took over for Favre it seemed like every game he had multiple players making catches in every game. To me it seems that this seemed to end when Joe Philbin left. I maybe wrong but it seems logical that this is why Joe is back, to create plays that are simple enough for the not so gifted WR to be able to contribute in some way. That’s my thoughts on this subject.

    • Kato

      I think those kind of games went away when McCarthy wanted to run more no huddle offense and did less personnel groupings. I think that more than anything led to less targets for other players. Although Philbin leaving probably played some role in that. I would prefer to see the packers be more multiple on offense as far as formations and personnel, they were a more unpredictable and efficient offense then. They can still mix in no huddle stuff from time to time.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *