<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Course Cullen Jenkins Wants to Return to Packers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cullen Jenkins Signs with Giants &#171; Total Packers Total Packers</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136530</link>
		<dc:creator>Cullen Jenkins Signs with Giants &#171; Total Packers Total Packers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was some suggestion that the Packers should be interested and the 32-year-old Jenkins said he was open to returning to Green Bay, the Packers didn&#8217;t show any interest. That&#8217;s not surprising, considering Ted Thompson [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was some suggestion that the Packers should be interested and the 32-year-old Jenkins said he was open to returning to Green Bay, the Packers didn&#8217;t show any interest. That&#8217;s not surprising, considering Ted Thompson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage57</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136380</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CJ is out to prove the statement that you can&#039;t catch lightning in a bottle twice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CJ is out to prove the statement that you can&#8217;t catch lightning in a bottle twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iltarion</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136282</link>
		<dc:creator>Iltarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Packer fans always want ex-Packers to come back to the team.

I think we had to hear about the prospect of Gilbert Brown coming back up to 10 years after he retired.

Yeah, Jenkins brings a little attitude that the Packers could use. I would be glad to see him back for less than $3 million a season, but let&#039;s not turn the guy into something he isn&#039;t. Cullen&#039;s best talent is getting to the passer, and the Packers were 4th in sacks last season. Not exactly what they need.

Personally, I think RJF is more of what the Packers need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packer fans always want ex-Packers to come back to the team.</p>
<p>I think we had to hear about the prospect of Gilbert Brown coming back up to 10 years after he retired.</p>
<p>Yeah, Jenkins brings a little attitude that the Packers could use. I would be glad to see him back for less than $3 million a season, but let&#8217;s not turn the guy into something he isn&#8217;t. Cullen&#8217;s best talent is getting to the passer, and the Packers were 4th in sacks last season. Not exactly what they need.</p>
<p>Personally, I think RJF is more of what the Packers need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FITZCORE1252</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136255</link>
		<dc:creator>FITZCORE1252</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we can get him on the cheap... Bring his ass back. As a rotational guy, I think he would be great at his age. He&#039;s a proven commodity.

GBP 4 LIFE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we can get him on the cheap&#8230; Bring his ass back. As a rotational guy, I think he would be great at his age. He&#8217;s a proven commodity.</p>
<p>GBP 4 LIFE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mxz600</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136245</link>
		<dc:creator>mxz600</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cullen Jenkins was a great Green Bay Packer, it&#039;s no secret our defensive line hasn&#039;t been the same since he left. if i remember right, the last year he was here, our defense was ranked 5th...The next season, 32nd...Would you rather have Jenkins at the veteran minimum or pay fat lard ass Ryan ( i landed on my ass again) Pickett for 6 million? I&#039;d welcome Jenkins back with open arms. And his agent is right, he never wanted to leave Green Bay. as a matter of fact he offered a hometown discount back then. Bring the man back, he&#039;s a player.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cullen Jenkins was a great Green Bay Packer, it&#8217;s no secret our defensive line hasn&#8217;t been the same since he left. if i remember right, the last year he was here, our defense was ranked 5th&#8230;The next season, 32nd&#8230;Would you rather have Jenkins at the veteran minimum or pay fat lard ass Ryan ( i landed on my ass again) Pickett for 6 million? I&#8217;d welcome Jenkins back with open arms. And his agent is right, he never wanted to leave Green Bay. as a matter of fact he offered a hometown discount back then. Bring the man back, he&#8217;s a player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2013/03/08/of-course-cullen-jenkins-wants-to-return-to-packers/#comment-136236</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=17383#comment-136236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s my guess too. If they can&#039;t work something out with Canty, RJF then and only then does Cullen become a more real option for us. He&#039;s still productive for his age and this position, DL, in particular seems to have more career longevity to it than other &quot;need&quot; areas such as RB, where the collisions come more often and shorten careers. 

I still agree that something must be done about our training staff. We either have drafted &quot;softer&quot; guys or they are not doing a good enough job stretching these guys out for game day or even padded practices for that matter. I&#039;m telling you YOGA is the answer! Meditate on that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my guess too. If they can&#8217;t work something out with Canty, RJF then and only then does Cullen become a more real option for us. He&#8217;s still productive for his age and this position, DL, in particular seems to have more career longevity to it than other &#8220;need&#8221; areas such as RB, where the collisions come more often and shorten careers. </p>
<p>I still agree that something must be done about our training staff. We either have drafted &#8220;softer&#8221; guys or they are not doing a good enough job stretching these guys out for game day or even padded practices for that matter. I&#8217;m telling you YOGA is the answer! Meditate on that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
