Comments on: Aaron Rodgers Ironically Lobbies for Charles Woodson’s Return

By: MadCity Packer Fan

MadCity Packer Fan — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:55:15 +0000

Letting Rodgers go is a huge mistake for this running QB fad. Running QB’s are 50% more injury prone and like we witnessed with the Redskins damn near ending a career for RG3 leaving him in there with an obvious injury is certainly not the way to go. Pick a team apart from the pocket and reserve the run for a last resort to get a first down and not a touchdown. Sure they can score but once they leave the pocket the defense and by that I mean big linebackers that have the opportunity to deliver some big hits on the operator of your offense! They will keep Rodgers. Letting him go is complete non sense by any estimation.

By: mxz600

mxz600 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:56:02 +0000

The list of cons failed to mention Woodson missed 9 games….Thats a pretty big factor in deciding wether you want to commit 1/12th of player payroll, to 1 player……………I did get a chuckle that Rodgers said Tramon is now taking the young players under his wing…as long as he isnt teaching them how to tackle, i’m ok with it :)

By: Don Q

Don Q — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:54:30 +0000

I would take a few million $ paycut to have better protection and 3 more Superbowl rings. Good on Rogers.

By: Iltarion

Iltarion — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:52:37 +0000

J-Mac would be a #1 draft pick if the sport was hotdog eating.

By: GBslacker

GBslacker — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:21:48 +0000

Yes, Running QBs are cool…

…until you’re prowling the morgue or graveyard, for cadaver ACLs.

By: GreenAndYellow

GreenAndYellow — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:04:57 +0000

i actually agree completely and was going to say essentially the same thing – although i also admit my judgment may be slightly clouded….but just this week on his radio show he specifically said that when people take big contracts they make it harder for the team to win when discussing woodson’s salary.

i also think he’ll take way less than he’s worth (although i’m sure there will be an increase) because he realizes that (a) $10 million, even for one year, is all the money and more a person could ever need/use, and (b) that winning has a direct relationship with how much he gets paid.

By: mike

mike — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:04:15 +0000

That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.

By: mike

mike — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:02:51 +0000

WHAT!!!

By: Iltarion

Iltarion — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:41:08 +0000

I think the running, big quarterback is the wave of the future.. I read on ESPN that JaMarcus Russell is making a comeback..he would be cheap and then we could keep Woodson and AJ Hawk and let Rodgers go, if he is too expensive.

By: #GetItRightRoger

#GetItRightRoger — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:52:54 +0000

Maybe Rodgers would rather win than make 20 million fucking dollars…