<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five More Thoughts on Packers Win Over Texans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevilDon</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-84666</link>
		<dc:creator>DevilDon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 05:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-84666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-83722&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pack Lethal:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 Growing up a Vikings fan I remember promise just to have my hopes n dreams crushed. It’s why I switched to the Packers cause they could win and were fun to watch. Now it feels like all the disappointments flooding back in. I hope this is the start of a turnaround.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So go back to the fucking Vikings you twat!
Absolutely nobody likes a fair weather fan. You don&#039;t like the heat? Get the hell out aight?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-83722" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>Pack Lethal:</em></strong><br />
</a><br />
 Growing up a Vikings fan I remember promise just to have my hopes n dreams crushed. It’s why I switched to the Packers cause they could win and were fun to watch. Now it feels like all the disappointments flooding back in. I hope this is the start of a turnaround.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So go back to the fucking Vikings you twat!<br />
Absolutely nobody likes a fair weather fan. You don&#8217;t like the heat? Get the hell out aight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer from Oshkosh</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-84010</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer from Oshkosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-84010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you two really do not know what you are talking about. besides the part about the purple all star RB not getting into the endzone. Not trying to bash, but you guys really do not know what you are talking about with the running game, playing shotgun, and Finley. If either one of you were running the team, the packers would be 0-4. Thats all i got to say about that. GO PACK GO!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you two really do not know what you are talking about. besides the part about the purple all star RB not getting into the endzone. Not trying to bash, but you guys really do not know what you are talking about with the running game, playing shotgun, and Finley. If either one of you were running the team, the packers would be 0-4. Thats all i got to say about that. GO PACK GO!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #GetItRightRoger</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83793</link>
		<dc:creator>#GetItRightRoger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m gonna have to agree with ya all here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to agree with ya all here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83738</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 2008, the Packers are 2-8 when they throw 70% or more in a game.  Less than 70%?  30-3!  This is an amazing stat that McCarthy cannot overlook.  The Pack must continue to have an effective running game - and establish it early - if they want to be considered Super Bowl contenders.

I disagree with some saying we need to be in shotgun every play.  Rodgers needs to be under center sometimes to keep defenses honest.  For example, Crabtree&#039;s TD on 3rd &amp; 1 would not have been there had it been shotgun formation... Texans would have less likely assumed a run.

Go Pack Go!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2008, the Packers are 2-8 when they throw 70% or more in a game.  Less than 70%?  30-3!  This is an amazing stat that McCarthy cannot overlook.  The Pack must continue to have an effective running game &#8211; and establish it early &#8211; if they want to be considered Super Bowl contenders.</p>
<p>I disagree with some saying we need to be in shotgun every play.  Rodgers needs to be under center sometimes to keep defenses honest.  For example, Crabtree&#8217;s TD on 3rd &amp; 1 would not have been there had it been shotgun formation&#8230; Texans would have less likely assumed a run.</p>
<p>Go Pack Go!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pack Lethal</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83722</link>
		<dc:creator>Pack Lethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up a Vikings fan I remember promise just to have my hopes n dreams crushed. It&#039;s why I switched to the Packers cause they could win and were fun to watch. Now it feels like all the disappointments flooding back in. I hope this is the start of a turnaround.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growing up a Vikings fan I remember promise just to have my hopes n dreams crushed. It&#8217;s why I switched to the Packers cause they could win and were fun to watch. Now it feels like all the disappointments flooding back in. I hope this is the start of a turnaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83717</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-83509&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;rebelgb:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 Cobb, another great TT pick.  Oh wait Green, another great TT pick.  Im not a TT fanboy but I am a realist.  Where are all the anti TT guys now?
Green is good. Really I think he’s good enough that our front office is wondering why the hell they spent any money on Benson.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, it&#039;s not like they&#039;re paying Benson all that much. He&#039;s the 22nd highest paid player on the team at $825,000. If nothing else he was providing depth for a position without a go to guy. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/team/green-bay-packers/salary/67046?q=green-bay-packers

I agree with what others have said regarding the run. The offense is running the ball more, but that is also theoretically leading to longer possessions which means our D is not where they tend to hurt us the most (on the field). If we don&#039;t get fucked in Seattle and play even below average in the second half in Indy, we&#039;d all be doing backflips over this team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-83509" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>rebelgb:</em></strong><br />
</a><br />
 Cobb, another great TT pick.  Oh wait Green, another great TT pick.  Im not a TT fanboy but I am a realist.  Where are all the anti TT guys now?<br />
Green is good. Really I think he’s good enough that our front office is wondering why the hell they spent any money on Benson.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re paying Benson all that much. He&#8217;s the 22nd highest paid player on the team at $825,000. If nothing else he was providing depth for a position without a go to guy. <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/team/green-bay-packers/salary/67046?q=green-bay-packers" rel="nofollow">http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/team/green-bay-packers/salary/67046?q=green-bay-packers</a></p>
<p>I agree with what others have said regarding the run. The offense is running the ball more, but that is also theoretically leading to longer possessions which means our D is not where they tend to hurt us the most (on the field). If we don&#8217;t get fucked in Seattle and play even below average in the second half in Indy, we&#8217;d all be doing backflips over this team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83548</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with most of what you are saying....no doubt shotgun is our best &amp; most productive formation &amp; our strength is throwing the football. I am also in 110% agreement that McCarthy needs to keep trying to win the game ala Belichik as opposed to &quot;managing&quot; the lead. All those pts are completely legit &amp; totally correct. 

Having said that though....I&#039;m not opposed to our running the ball 25-35 times a game either. Our &#039;11 team lit up the scoreboard but that put our D out there a long time too. Gotta find a way to keep them fresher &amp; still be aggressive offensively. McCarthy&#039;s mistake in the past (he showed good discipline last nite) was he either over committed to pass or run depending on the scoreboard. He should make a oath to his Maker that he will never look at the scoreboard again. He&#039;d pass to get the lead then run to burn clock &amp; shorten the game. Guaranteed we&#039;d run on 1st &amp; 2nd down out of offset I or Bone...the throw a safe route on 3rd &amp; long.  9x out of ten that blew up in our face because we dont have the OL to impose our will plus it was predictable. I lost count of how many times we squandered leads &amp; the momentum with that approach. 

However, in football logic, that is the correct approach! Except we dont have the personnel to execute it!  Which is exactly why PackAttack is 100% correct in his analysis. Thus, I would say it isnt running the football that is wrong....but how &amp; when &amp; what situation &amp; formation we do it out of. Why should we EVER invite teams to put 8 in the box against us in an &quot;obvious run/burn clock situation?&quot; And THAT right there is what is wrong....there is no &quot;obvious run/burn clock situation&quot; with Brady &amp; Belichik....they refuse to be defined &amp; influenced by the situation and refuse to surrender the initiative. Which in turn has always allowed them to run the ball consistently &amp; effectively regardless of who was carrying it.  Danny Woodhead? Would he even make our team? Yet he gets it done for them because the Def still sees Brady as a threat. 

We have the same potential if not more. Except the other team HAS TO believe we are committed to scoring.....and NOT paying homage to the scoreboard letting it dictate either the run or pass game. McCarthy has been too black &amp; white and predictable in his tactical approach to the game. He needs to be a solid shade of Gray because the League has adjusted to us....they&#039;ve figured us out. Last nite was a preview of what we can be if we change our tactical approach to the game. I hope it sticks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what you are saying&#8230;.no doubt shotgun is our best &amp; most productive formation &amp; our strength is throwing the football. I am also in 110% agreement that McCarthy needs to keep trying to win the game ala Belichik as opposed to &#8220;managing&#8221; the lead. All those pts are completely legit &amp; totally correct. </p>
<p>Having said that though&#8230;.I&#8217;m not opposed to our running the ball 25-35 times a game either. Our &#8217;11 team lit up the scoreboard but that put our D out there a long time too. Gotta find a way to keep them fresher &amp; still be aggressive offensively. McCarthy&#8217;s mistake in the past (he showed good discipline last nite) was he either over committed to pass or run depending on the scoreboard. He should make a oath to his Maker that he will never look at the scoreboard again. He&#8217;d pass to get the lead then run to burn clock &amp; shorten the game. Guaranteed we&#8217;d run on 1st &amp; 2nd down out of offset I or Bone&#8230;the throw a safe route on 3rd &amp; long.  9x out of ten that blew up in our face because we dont have the OL to impose our will plus it was predictable. I lost count of how many times we squandered leads &amp; the momentum with that approach. </p>
<p>However, in football logic, that is the correct approach! Except we dont have the personnel to execute it!  Which is exactly why PackAttack is 100% correct in his analysis. Thus, I would say it isnt running the football that is wrong&#8230;.but how &amp; when &amp; what situation &amp; formation we do it out of. Why should we EVER invite teams to put 8 in the box against us in an &#8220;obvious run/burn clock situation?&#8221; And THAT right there is what is wrong&#8230;.there is no &#8220;obvious run/burn clock situation&#8221; with Brady &amp; Belichik&#8230;.they refuse to be defined &amp; influenced by the situation and refuse to surrender the initiative. Which in turn has always allowed them to run the ball consistently &amp; effectively regardless of who was carrying it.  Danny Woodhead? Would he even make our team? Yet he gets it done for them because the Def still sees Brady as a threat. </p>
<p>We have the same potential if not more. Except the other team HAS TO believe we are committed to scoring&#8230;..and NOT paying homage to the scoreboard letting it dictate either the run or pass game. McCarthy has been too black &amp; white and predictable in his tactical approach to the game. He needs to be a solid shade of Gray because the League has adjusted to us&#8230;.they&#8217;ve figured us out. Last nite was a preview of what we can be if we change our tactical approach to the game. I hope it sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TyKoSteamboat</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83512</link>
		<dc:creator>TyKoSteamboat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That is kinda an unfair statement. Green is coming off of major knee surgery &amp; the Benson marriage was just a 1 yr. contract.
Cedric Benson is a 1,000 yd. rusher the last 3 seasons &amp; the Packers&#039; off. line is C average at best.
Depth at the RB position in the NFL is crucial. The days of Emmitt Smith &amp; Barry Sanders are over.
Every team in the NFL is a &#039;running-back by commitee&#039;
&amp; also, Benson will be back for the last 3 reg. season games &amp; if we&#039;re lucky/better the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br />
That is kinda an unfair statement. Green is coming off of major knee surgery &amp; the Benson marriage was just a 1 yr. contract.<br />
Cedric Benson is a 1,000 yd. rusher the last 3 seasons &amp; the Packers&#8217; off. line is C average at best.<br />
Depth at the RB position in the NFL is crucial. The days of Emmitt Smith &amp; Barry Sanders are over.<br />
Every team in the NFL is a &#8216;running-back by commitee&#8217;<br />
&amp; also, Benson will be back for the last 3 reg. season games &amp; if we&#8217;re lucky/better the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebelgb</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83509</link>
		<dc:creator>rebelgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cobb, another great TT pick.  Oh wait Green, another great TT pick.  Im not a TT fanboy but I am a realist.  Where are all the anti TT guys now?

Green is good. Really I think he&#039;s good enough that our front office is wondering why the hell they spent any money on Benson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobb, another great TT pick.  Oh wait Green, another great TT pick.  Im not a TT fanboy but I am a realist.  Where are all the anti TT guys now?</p>
<p>Green is good. Really I think he&#8217;s good enough that our front office is wondering why the hell they spent any money on Benson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/10/15/five-more-thoughts-on-packers-win-over-texans/#comment-83497</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 01:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15668#comment-83497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got beat by the 49ers. We beat the Seahawks but it counts as a loss. We gave up a huge lead to the Colts and lost by 3. The stories are more similar than you are making it out to be. 

I agree with your other points though, as I usually do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got beat by the 49ers. We beat the Seahawks but it counts as a loss. We gave up a huge lead to the Colts and lost by 3. The stories are more similar than you are making it out to be. </p>
<p>I agree with your other points though, as I usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
