Comments on: Brett Favre Joins the Fray http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Thu, 23 May 2013 01:12:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Pack Lethal http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-79802 Pack Lethal Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:19:54 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-79802 How did purple princess perspective find her way here?

]]> By: Wolf Packer http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-79458 Wolf Packer Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:55:42 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-79458 You were 10. Whatta you know? I know you have a big mouth you ignorant whelp.

]]> By: Wolf Packer http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-79429 Wolf Packer Tue, 02 Oct 2012 03:52:34 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-79429 Donny H shut the fuck up with that we woulda gone n won a sb with anyone shit. you were 10 whatta you know. dd are you a viking or da bear or just pure dumbshit. cry mite have a point with the oline saints d is shit fuckin bulaga

]]> By: cry me a river http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-79404 cry me a river Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:03:38 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-79404 “In conclusion, if Brent gets benched in ’93 in favor of Brunell then we still have a Super Bowl that season. Ron Wolf brought the title back, not Favre.”
“……….93′ in favor of Brunnell….we still have a Super Bowl that season.”
It is confusing.

“……….part of one of the most complete teams every fielded.”
……..every fielded???
Need I say more?

My reading comprehension is quite excellent. Use of basic communication skills goes far in debate & debates provide an orderly format for sharing ideas & exploring topics through well-planned arguments. Debate challenges the mind! Use of belittlement is a thinly veiled displacement of intellect & you don’t need to do that as I’m quite certain you have something intelligent to share. As for trolling, I do like competitive match-ups & the corresponding debate associated with the NFL. Where better to get deep insight into a team than it’s most ardent supporters? If the Packers are that good (I believe they are though I do question the O-line & would like to see the D have more flexibility for use in creative blitz packages), then they can withstand the scrutiny of inquiry! Yea, I’m here for the season!

]]> By: the real jeff ircink http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-79399 the real jeff ircink Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:28:11 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-79399 donny h. is delusional…..duhhhhhhhhhhh. it’s best you finish that lobotomy you were in the middle of…..

]]> By: Pack Lethal http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-78911 Pack Lethal Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:05:32 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-78911 DD that is such an old subject. It would be like trying to convince people why you think John Kerry should have won the election. Stop living in the past and see a shrink.

]]> By: DD http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-78904 DD Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:51:31 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-78904 Your hero, Ron Wolf who you say saved the franchise, admitted his biggest regret was that he surrounded Favre with poor offensive talent. Favre’s top two receivers were hurt for most of that season. And he was still the league MVP. He’s the only player on that offense who is going to the Hall of Fame. If they were such a “complete” team as you say, it is only because Favre was on the offense. You lose brah.

]]> By: Donny H. http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-78878 Donny H. Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:40:48 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-78878 Cry,

Your obvious trolling is obvious. The cowgirls and 9ers dominated the early 90s – this is a fact known by everyone. My post is clearly referring to the 1 title earned by the back during the ’96 season.

But I’ll help you out with this concept since your reading comprehension is piss poor. Brett was very fortunate to be part of one of the most complete teams every fielded. The outstanding skill surrounding him made him a better player, not the other way around. So again, if he would have been benched in place of Mark Brunell 3 years earlier, the Pack STILL brings the Lombardi home in the ’96 season.

P.S. Eat a dick.

That is all.

]]> By: Cry me a river http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-78869 Cry me a river Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:23:34 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-78869 Donny H.,
Are you serious about a Super Bowl win in 93? If you are serious, that is wishful thing at it’s finest & I will know to ignore your posts due to delusional thinking & meritless argument.

]]> By: Donny H. http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/09/27/brett-favre-joins-the-fray/#comment-78639 Donny H. Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:54:53 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=15510#comment-78639 I was 10 when XXXI happened. Brett could do anything that season but so could ANY decent starting QB if they were in his place. Think about it.

You got a kick ass defense that will win you time of possession. You got Desmond Howard giving you great field position. A stellar o-line giving you time to throw. Young, talented receivers (even without brooks halfway through). And to quote a really good song (bonus points if you can name it) “Were happy because we got 2 tight ends. Because Sterling Sharpe, he whines alot, hes on the ESPN.”

In conclusion, if Brent gets benched in ’93 in favor of Brunell then we still have a Super Bowl that season. Ron Wolf brought the title back, not Favre.

]]>