Comments on: Packers Are Not Who We Thought They Were

By: mxz600

mxz600 — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:41:58 +0000

Iltarian……Still living in fantasyland, not able to come to terms with the reality of Green bay Packers weak area’s…Hows that 0 line Iltarian?….Still fine?…Hows the running game Iltarian..Still fine?……How’s the secondary Iltarian…Still fine?……….One thing the Packers did ok with last year, was the run defense was ok….but 186 yards?…Are you kidding me?

By: nurseratchett

nurseratchett — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:01:02 +0000

Technically, I would be a WHINEY bitch, not winey bastard.

EVERYTIME I post you doubt my status as a fan? You haven’t read very many of my posts. Go back a couple of years & read my all I want for Christmas rant which won ME some SWAG!

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism, or in this case, fan loyalty. I bitch because I love, just like most of the people who show up here do, including Monty.

As a fan, although impossible, I want the Pack to win EVERY game; to look prepared & awesome against EVERY TEAM. When we don’t, I complain about it, re-watch the game, and backseat coach from my couch (or computer).

I am the WORST kind of hardcore fan….the obnoxious stats girl who drives the Bears/Titans/Rams fans I’m surrounded by in Southern Illinois CRAZY when they try to talk shit about my Packers.

Call me anything you like, sir, but do NOT call me a tourist when referring to my status as a GREEN BAY PACKER FAN.

GO PACK GO!

By: Andy

Andy — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:02:01 +0000

On the plus side, at least the slap in the face came early this year so there’s time to turn it around.

Additionally why have a running back when you can put cobb in the backfield, he got a favourable match up each time and could take 6-7 yards for each catch, i thought it made SF ease off on the blitz to cover him.

By: PackerLeap

PackerLeap — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:53:13 +0000

Itarion you seem to have missed the point of this blog. We can all express our opinions, whether you like it or not. If you don’t like what you see here you are welcome to go elsewhere. You can disagree with an opinion but to criticize someone for having that opinion is simply ludicrous.

By: iltarion

iltarion — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:34:49 +0000

Props to everyone who posted after VJ. You pretty much said it all.

Its fine that the 49ers are a better team than the Packers right now. It is Week 1. The Packers know this better than anyone after being the best team for 13 weeks last season.

We hope the title game goes through Candlestick. Better there than Lambeau Field in late January.

This site sounds more and more like TotalDipshits.com. I came here instead of GBpressgazette.com to get away from the moronic crybabies who pretend to be “realists” while seemingly forgetting the REALITY that this team has won 21 of its last 24 games including a Super Bowl.

Go do your bitching to fans of a real loser like the Vikes, Jaguars or Rams. Maybe they’ll let you know how good you got it. Maybe you’ll get a clue… maybe.

By: Pack Lethal

Pack Lethal — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:27:45 +0000

If Rodgers doesn’t throw that pick we would have won. Oh well, that loss is just another reason to beat the shit out of the Bears. Go Pack!

By: Packerfan2008

Packerfan2008 — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:13:10 +0000

Shut the fuck up all of you. It’s the first game against one of the best teams in the league. Pack has a very young team that needs to develop. Winning is nice but sometimes losing makes you better and hopefully if it doesn’t workout this year they can make a good run next year. And yes, those refs totally blew in that game. but the packers sucked and would of lost anyway.

By: TyKoSteamboat

TyKoSteamboat — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:01:32 +0000

The greatest disappointment is we just got our asses completely kicked.
Defense, offense…But especially coaching.
(And i rarely feel that way about this regeme)
They were better prepared.
They called a better game.
They controlled the clock & dictated the tempo.
We’re 0-1 and it was a home game.
We better get our sh*t together or the Bears are gonna bring-it on Thursday.

By: PackerLeap

PackerLeap — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:49:05 +0000

The game was a look into the future. The defense simply flounders. There doesn’t seem to be any system to the DB’s, they drop coverage expecting the safeties to pick but they aren’t there. The D should be a 4-3 to achieve a better rush to help out the hapless backs. They could also slow the run with a 4-3. The linebackers were good yesterday but they are expected to act like linemen but don’t have the size. Capers never varies wether it works or not. The offense will come around.

By: PackerBoB

PackerBoB — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:27:27 +0000

Har har har.