Comments on: Packers Add Receiver Because They Need Another Receiver http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:55:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: DevilDon http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/#comment-69141 DevilDon Thu, 09 Aug 2012 06:58:59 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=14919#comment-69141 What? Celine Dion wasn’t on waivers?

]]> By: Ivomitonvikingfans http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/#comment-69129 Ivomitonvikingfans Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:35:18 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=14919#comment-69129 I am guessing he lifted a copy of the Philly playbook. The UFL to 1265? Those shady Northwestern motherfuckers know how to work their way up the ladder one way or another.

]]> By: nurseratchett http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/#comment-69081 nurseratchett Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:57:31 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=14919#comment-69081 Running game? We don’t need no stinking running game!

QB, 4 offensive linemen, 6 wide receiver set. Lets start calling it west coast meets frozen tundra offense…

GO PACK GO!

]]> By: nurseratchett http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/#comment-69080 nurseratchett Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:55:19 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=14919#comment-69080 lmao

]]> By: Jonathan http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/08/08/packers-add-receiver-because-they-need-another-receiver/#comment-69076 Jonathan Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:27:26 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=14919#comment-69076 THIS IS OFFENSIVE TO ME. YOU ARE A JERK. I DEMAND AN APOLOGY.

]]>