<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodson Not Opposed To Playing Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packers Sign Second-Rounder Casey Hayward &#124; Total Packers</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58865</link>
		<dc:creator>Packers Sign Second-Rounder Casey Hayward &#124; Total Packers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] job. He may also be looked at as a starter, which would pave the way for Charles Woodson&#8216;s move to safety. That is, of course, if Hayward doesn&#8217;t turn out to be Pat [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] job. He may also be looked at as a starter, which would pave the way for Charles Woodson&#8216;s move to safety. That is, of course, if Hayward doesn&#8217;t turn out to be Pat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iltarion</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58676</link>
		<dc:creator>iltarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what fact you are alluding to.

Here are some though:

Woodson was a Pro Bowl CB last season.

Woodson, as a CB, tied for the NFL lead in INTs with 7. 

Several opposing offensive coordinators said they stopped throwing the ball at Woodson in the 2nd half of the season. They said throwing the ball at Tramon was smarter than risking a pick.

Has Woodson declined as a CB? A little, sure. But my point is that the &quot;facts&quot; don&#039;t seem to support the notion that Woodson HAS to move to safety to keep playing in the NFL. 

Ironically, the number #1 decline for Woodson last season was his tackling and his blitzing ability, which explains why I have some reservations about how successful he can be at safety.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what fact you are alluding to.</p>
<p>Here are some though:</p>
<p>Woodson was a Pro Bowl CB last season.</p>
<p>Woodson, as a CB, tied for the NFL lead in INTs with 7. </p>
<p>Several opposing offensive coordinators said they stopped throwing the ball at Woodson in the 2nd half of the season. They said throwing the ball at Tramon was smarter than risking a pick.</p>
<p>Has Woodson declined as a CB? A little, sure. But my point is that the &#8220;facts&#8221; don&#8217;t seem to support the notion that Woodson HAS to move to safety to keep playing in the NFL. </p>
<p>Ironically, the number #1 decline for Woodson last season was his tackling and his blitzing ability, which explains why I have some reservations about how successful he can be at safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck W.</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58638</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than have Woodson replace Collins at FS, I&#039;d guess he becomes the starting SS and Burnett moves over to FS full-time (where he played much of last year).  Woodson can definitely tackle better than Burnett and appears to be a better blitzer -- those sound more like SS characteristics to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than have Woodson replace Collins at FS, I&#8217;d guess he becomes the starting SS and Burnett moves over to FS full-time (where he played much of last year).  Woodson can definitely tackle better than Burnett and appears to be a better blitzer &#8212; those sound more like SS characteristics to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarynfor12</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58621</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarynfor12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woodson has just shown what many other veterans don&#039;t/won&#039;t/can&#039;t,the acceptance of fact,if he wants to continue playing for a few more years,it is/must/will be at another position.
His statement cannot be any more PC and that excites the fans ,the team and himself as he reaps the rewards for being so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodson has just shown what many other veterans don&#8217;t/won&#8217;t/can&#8217;t,the acceptance of fact,if he wants to continue playing for a few more years,it is/must/will be at another position.<br />
His statement cannot be any more PC and that excites the fans ,the team and himself as he reaps the rewards for being so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iltarion</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58570</link>
		<dc:creator>iltarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 03:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need Heyward or House to be able to play the outside so that Shields can play the slot. Since he is quicker than he is physical, that is the perfect place for him. 

C-Wood is the frickin man. What can you say. I am actually kinda surprised he is this amiable to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need Heyward or House to be able to play the outside so that Shields can play the slot. Since he is quicker than he is physical, that is the perfect place for him. </p>
<p>C-Wood is the frickin man. What can you say. I am actually kinda surprised he is this amiable to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58568</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 03:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget all the young guys getting an off season as well.  That is why sam guys didn&#039;t progress.  I think You will see a big jump in improvement in the corner play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget all the young guys getting an off season as well.  That is why sam guys didn&#8217;t progress.  I think You will see a big jump in improvement in the corner play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer from Oshkosh</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58544</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer from Oshkosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Davon House is going to be a good corner in the NFL. He was a guy, I believe, the packers did not want to expose too much to ingame action in his first year... kind of like they did with Aaron Rodgers, in order to help his confidence and abilities. I believe House has a real good chance to be the starter opposite Tramon Williams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davon House is going to be a good corner in the NFL. He was a guy, I believe, the packers did not want to expose too much to ingame action in his first year&#8230; kind of like they did with Aaron Rodgers, in order to help his confidence and abilities. I believe House has a real good chance to be the starter opposite Tramon Williams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58541</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget D House....we don&#039;t know what we have yet with him as a CB. Hopefully he has a strong summer and adds some competition to the mix]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget D House&#8230;.we don&#8217;t know what we have yet with him as a CB. Hopefully he has a strong summer and adds some competition to the mix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCO</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/05/08/woodson-not-opposed-to-playing-safety/#comment-58527</link>
		<dc:creator>JCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13990#comment-58527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He just wants to win. If him playing safety is best for the team, Woodson doesn&#039;t mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He just wants to win. If him playing safety is best for the team, Woodson doesn&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
