Comments on: Packers Sign Jeff Saturday http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Mon, 20 May 2013 03:56:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Apeshit http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52525 Apeshit Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:09:48 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52525 2 years 7.75 what’s ur point fuckface?

]]> By: mxz600 http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52292 mxz600 Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:01:54 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52292 But your smart iltarian, you “know everything”…How much did he pay him?

]]> By: iltarion http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52177 iltarion Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:43:34 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52177 The Packers were 15-1 without Jenkins.

They are the favorites to win next year’s Super Bowl.

You can’t pay everyone. He was over 30 years old and had a habit of being oft-injured. We had 3 cheap and young replacements behind him. Only hindsight tells us those 3 would bomb.

For Gods sake, get over it.

]]> By: takan74 http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52167 takan74 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:48:19 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52167 You sir are an idiot @ Mxz600

]]> By: Donny H. http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52153 Donny H. Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:49:07 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52153 In Soviet Russia, TV watches You!!

]]> By: Kristofer from Oshkosh http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52135 Kristofer from Oshkosh Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:15:30 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52135 This reply was meant @ robg29109@hotmail.com

]]> By: Kristofer from Oshkosh http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52134 Kristofer from Oshkosh Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:14:41 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52134 Do you even know what you are talking about? Its not that the Pack didn’t want Scott Wells; Wells wanted too much payment for his services and there are salary cap issues. If the Packers could choose between Jeff Saturday and Scott Wells, and money wasn’t a factor- The Pack would rather have Wells. No need to be so dissappointed, it’s the nature of the business.

]]> By: mxz600 http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52085 mxz600 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:55:26 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52085 Vijay…TT didn’t need Jenkins, he had Mike Neal.

]]> By: peter http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52083 peter Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:40:05 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52083 How many pro-bowls teams has Saturday made… how many has wells made… how long did it take wells to make a pro-bowl.. how long did it take saturday

That is a great signing and an upgrade at center. Saturday was running the line on probably the most complex o in the league.

]]> By: mxz600 http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/03/23/packers-sign-jeff-saturday/#comment-52075 mxz600 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:15:25 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=13407#comment-52075 But your smart iltarian, you “know everything”…How much did he pay him?

]]>