Comments on: Packers Have Discussed Tim Tebow Trade

By: Hacksaw

Hacksaw — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:46:34 +0000

Tebow would be a good tight end. Lol!

By: Peter

Peter — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:47:04 +0000

And the idiot of the week statement goes to you
Congratulations you won a signed Brett Favre dick pic

By: Mr Hurd

Mr Hurd — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:25:52 +0000

Can’t do it, the Pack aldredy retired #15

By: billyschwills

billyschwills — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:47 +0000

See? You said it all in 2 words. That asshole took up half the internet to talk about his interesting views.

By: Kristofer from Oshkosh

Kristofer from Oshkosh — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:16:16 +0000

ferfuxsake man.

By: billyschwills

billyschwills — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:50:42 +0000

Wow are you paid by the word? Verbose is a fucking understatement. You must be really fun at parties.

Just a tip, try cutting out about 80% of your bullshit and you will be 150% more tolerable and interesting.

By: Savage57

Savage57 — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:50:27 +0000

I just woke up.

By: TyKo Steamboat

TyKo Steamboat — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:39:25 +0000

Trade Clay Matthews III for Tebow…do you think the Doncos would take him (Matthews) off of our hands?

By: The Floridian Packer Fan

The Floridian Packer Fan — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:56:31 +0000

Korey, awesome post, and I agree with ya. Tim needs to improve, who better then last seasons MVP? Plus, if Tim is able to improve his game, and gets a chance to show it off, like Mat, maybe GB will be in a better situation to trade him for anything higher then what they give to that horse toothed jackass in Denver. More depth at the qb position (isn’t that what GB is know for, depth?) and a higher draft pick or two in the future, its a win, win situation. GO GET JESUS BOY TT!!

By: iltarion

iltarion — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:20:11 +0000

Actually, I see nearly ZERO sense in the notion of Tebow coming to Green Bay.

The #1 thing Tebow wants is to start. He has ZERO chance to do that here.

There is zero comparison between JAX, MIA, BUF and here. All three of those teams could clearly need a franchise QB, which the Packers do not need. Even in BUF, if Fitzpatrick has a year similar to last, the Bills may be looking to get free of his contract. Signing Tebow could be just the fire Fitz needs lit under his ass.

In MIA and JAX, I don’t care who they recently signed. Tebow could very well be the starter for either team.

Secondly, Graham Harrell is a more talented prospect than Matt Flynn was. The Packers aren’t desperate for a back up QB, or they wouldn’t have given Harrell the same contract they gave Flynn.

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the Packers are an already popular, championship caliber team. Tebow would be a distraction, an unwarranted one. What would be the payoff that would justify that??

The only way I see this making any sense is if McCarthy has a plan to use Tebow in like short yardage or something. The Packers haven’t exactly been money on 3rd and 2 for years now.

But, I expect Tebow will have a say in where he goes, and I suspect GB would be near the bottom of the list because there is no chance for him to start here.