Comments on: Packers Will Get Nothing For Matt Flynn http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Sat, 25 May 2013 17:50:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Jurgens http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43974 Jurgens Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:42:16 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43974 Sign and trades are not unheard of especially if the player and team is on good terms. Thanks for being a dick, Richard.

]]> By: iltarion http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43134 iltarion Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:49 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43134 Monty is leaving out the fact that the Packers would be getting a 3rd round pick. Understood.

A 3rd round pick isn’t bad for a guy with two starts. The worth of the pick depends on who you draft.

I fail to see the point in discussing something that would never happen. I would rather discuss my date with Jessica Biel.

]]> By: PackerBob http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43132 PackerBob Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:42:04 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43132 Why are people even talking about trading Rogers and keeping Flynn? You honestly think they’re both system QBs?! We’ve seen Flynn start two games. TWO GAMES, PEOPLE! Granted the second game was amazing but …come, man!

]]> By: Mike R http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43130 Mike R Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:31:11 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43130 I hope you were drunk when you wrote this. No way in hell should the Packers trade arguably the best QB in the league. Insert all of Doug’s points. What guarantee is there the Flynn will amount to anything? None. Back to the main point. What the fuck are you talking about? Trade Rodgers? Richard, are you sure you aren’t actually Ted Thompson and just changed you screen name? Or Bill Polian perhaps? You a fucking moron.

]]> By: Ryan http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43127 Ryan Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:37:54 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43127 It might solve the one concern of what to do with Matt Flynn but it opens up so many doors. Wait, why are we even talking about this? Trading Rodgers??? I don’t know how to put this any other way: That is the dumbest idea I have ever read on this blog.

]]> By: Richard http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43119 Richard Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:02:29 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43119 There is no way to actually know how it would work out, but it does solve all these concerns about losing a starting-caliber QB and getting nothing in return. Matt Flynn and about 5 extra first rounders doesn’t sound bad at all.

]]> By: Doug http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43111 Doug Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:08:22 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43111 No offense Richard, but that is absurd. You’re using a Brett Favre example based on knowing what those next 10 years held. The QB position is easily the most important on the field, and first ballot hall of famers don’t just fall out of the sky. We’ve been incredibly lucky. Hell, look at how many QBs Chicago has gone through the past 15 years…

Trading Rodgers would be hands down the dumbest decision in the history of the Packers organization.

]]> By: Richard http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43107 Richard Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:06:54 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43107 Or they could trade Rodgers at his peak for a boatload of draft picks. He won’t be worth any more than he is right now. Imagine what GB could’ve gotten for Favre back after losing to Elway. It would’ve been much more valuable than 3-6 in the playoffs over the next 10 seasons.

]]> By: Richard http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43105 Richard Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:03:37 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43105 Don’t they get a 2013 compensatory pick though if he walks? Possibly as high as a 3rd rounder? Not the same as a blockbuster trade deal but then Ted doesn’t have to concern himself with the 14 million dollar number.

]]> By: Richard http://www.totalpackers.com/2012/02/02/packers-will-get-nothing-for-matt-flynn/#comment-43104 Richard Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:22 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=12657#comment-43104 What reason would Matt Flynn have to voluntarily sign a contract with GB just to get traded, especially if it was less than 14 million?

]]>