Comments on: Stock Sale Is Making Packers Rich, So Here Comes Some More

By: No,_I_am_an_OWNER

No,_I_am_an_OWNER — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:18:20 +0000

I like how the money goes right to the team…no middlemen cutting deep into the profits. Yeah, all I own is a blade of grass on the field, but it’s MY FUCKIN’ BLADE OF GRASS! you buy a ‘game worn’ jersey for $265. half of that money goes to who made the jersey..the other half goes into a pot thats split among the 32 teams.. Yeah, Even the Packers gets a bit of scratch from your ‘Bears’ jersey. Buy more of them..but my stock money went to the Packers. ONLY the Packers.
MY PACKERS!

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:01:37 +0000

People, including “Bears fan” don’t understand the concept of utility. If I get great value/satisfaction, or utility, from buying a share, then so be it. It is no different that buying some other good, like an iPod. It doesn’t matter the tangible worth of the item I am receiving; what matters is the utility I receive. Since the utility I receive is worth far more than $275, it is a great use of my money.

By: rebelgb

rebelgb — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:25:39 +0000

LOL I have to say Bears Fan post was pretty fucking funny! Hats off to you fuck tard. I do appreciate a good chuckle.

As for you people jumping on Sheri, hey go jerk off will ya? If you read her fucking post shes on her side. Besides, I agree with her; fuck Monty trying to act like the Packers are being somehow dishonest about the whole ownership vs. value shit. People have known for 50 fucking years that the Packer stock isnt worth shit. The Packers arent trying to make it about anything else.

I love the fact we dont need some fat peice of shit owner who may be paying too many ex-wives to pony up dough for a good team to run our franchice.

By: WilliamVanillium

WilliamVanillium — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:34:49 +0000

Hey bear fan. What white guy did you have to threaten to get online and type semi-legibly for you? I understand that with your meager lone Lombardi trophy coupled with a franchise in decline that you may be sadder than “Brian’s Song II: The Lemon Party.”

We in Wisconsin may be as dumb as you say we are but we can rest our waterheads on our multitude of trophies and our most recent NFC championship embarrassment at that swollen old hooker cunt that you call a stadium. Sweetness himself couldn’t save that Edmund Fitzgerald of a team. Neither could your lord and savior ditka who evey day looks more like a botoxed out Freddy mercury. Hopefully he has the aids too.

My advice is to do what McMahon did. Get away from the scumbag bears and get with a real team of champs. Or do like Kevin butler and fade away quietly with a mouthful of dicks. Or no.

By: Bears Fan

Bears Fan — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:29:15 +0000

Fitting that the biggest fleecing in the NFL is paired perfectly with the dumbest fans in the league. Poor little Johnny can’t go to bow hunter’s safety class because “we had to buy a share of the Packers for the Christ’s sake, or no.” That will look great over the bar in your basement, right next to the Brett Favre poster mom won’t let dad take down. On Wisconsin!

By: some guy

some guy — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:10:34 +0000

Oh, and 6,700 more seats. I love how we’re trying to work out a way to present 53,000+ more Packer fans being able to see live football at Lambeau over the course of a season as a bad thing.

By: some guy

some guy — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:08:18 +0000

I guess there’s no end to the willingness to complain that the Packers are team that takes a long-term look. It used to be that TT was always trying to get young for its own sake and should just bring in some free agents already – that act was a bit hard to keep up once draft-and-develop turned into a SB, so now we’re on to complaining that the Packers are preparing for the possibility that they aren’t guaranteed to spend the next few decades as hot, marketable, and visible as they are now.

When do you expect them to expand the stadium? Should they have done it after 6-10 in ’08? Of course they’re going to do it after winning the super bowl, because that’s when the opportunity presents itself. This is going to pay off down the line in the form of greater long-term franchise viability, and everyone currently whining about what a cash grab this is (and who exactly is pocketing the nonexistant profits, again?) will be pointing back to this decision 10-20-30 years from now and acting like they knew it was the way to go all along.

By: Diane

Diane — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:55:27 +0000

I bought a share and am happy I did. Nobody is twisting our arms or anything. We know it is basically donating $250 plus the $25 to the Packers and we don’t care. They told us upfront that it wasn’t worth anything monetarily, but we bought it anyway. I’m glad there will be 30,000 more shares available and I’m sure people will buy out those also. I always wanted to buy stock in something……and a Packer share was perfect. Go Pack Go!

By: billyVanilly

billyVanilly — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:35:15 +0000

Sheri, I don’t want to offend any of the younger readers, but you sound like a textbook C U N T. The theme of your post is “if you don’t like it then don’t buy it”. And yet ironically you complain about and insult the author of a free website. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. Just because your unkempt and unappreciated genitals look like billy Mays eating three packs of Big League Chew, doesn’t mean you can come out here and badmouth TotalPackers. My thought is that with a little relief downstairs, you might not be such a C on internet comments.

By: RodgerDat

RodgerDat — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:18:25 +0000

License to print money, hahahah. Yeah, what u gonna do about it bitch! Im sure that’s what the front office is saying right now as they stack that cheese.

At the end of the day, as long as it’s for the team and not hookers and drugs for the suits. Its not hurting anyone just helping the team and ultimately the fans with more seats available in the stadium.