Comments on: Holding A Late Lead, Packers’ Defense is Dominant

By: rebelgb

rebelgb — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:12:28 +0000

The Packers defense sucks and im sick of fanbois trying to sugar coat it.

Has anyone ffing mentioned the fact that had the DEFENSE NOT GIVEN up so many points in the first place they wouldnt have to ffing HOLD the lead?? Jesus Christ man, logic for the win.

Still love the Pack.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:23:11 +0000

Man am I sick of everyone talking about our defense in a bad way. Did we all forget that the team with the most points wins and that has been us going back to last year ? Yards dont mean shit! What ifs dont mean shit! We actually have the highest point differential between points allowed and points scored. Why is no one talking about that? Thank you for this article to prove that when it matters we get it done. I could care less if we go down with the worse pass defense in the league with all the wins and the eventual championship.

By: ay hombre

ay hombre — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:12:50 +0000

I hope you’re right. I must say I’m pretty surprised the Packers are -14 with the Vikings coming off the bye. That line feels off. It’s as if the oddsmakers have drawn a line in the sand and are forcing people to pay a premium if they want to take the Packers. I’m not saying it’s impossible for them to cover, but to me the spread should be no more than 11.

By: Daybreak Doppler: Three Down, One To Go | PocketDoppler.com

Daybreak Doppler: Three Down, One To Go | PocketDoppler.com — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:17:02 +0000

[...] Total Packers says that when Holding A Late Lead, Packers’ Defense is Dominant. [...]

By: iltarion

iltarion — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:31:42 +0000

I expect the Packers to play better defense starting this week against Minny.

Burnett getting his cast off will give the Packers 11 tacklers instead of 10. Tramon is getting healthier, and Matthews is due for a big game.

By: I Got Woodson

I Got Woodson — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:19:12 +0000

Mxz600 –

Did you even read the article (assuming you can read, that is)? At no point does it claim that our defense is dominant. All it’s saying is that the defense has played well when the game’s on the line.

By: Hacksaw

Hacksaw — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:17:30 +0000

Mxz 600, take your buttfucking ass back to Purple Jesus Diaries. Someone simple like you doesn’t belong here. Why don’t you use your real name Lockout 2011. Then move out of Wisconsin. I thought I smelled trash when I was driving there last weekend, so move out. I enjoy the clean air, but instead all I could smell was gay butt sex coming from your vacinity. Fuck off Lockout 2011.

By: Vijay

Vijay — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:19:21 +0000

This still would be a dominant team in all phases with an effective pass rush. Let’s hope Mike ‘Harrell’ Neal will provide some help there in the coming weeks.

By: mxz600

mxz600 — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:35:46 +0000

lol…Love you guys, talking about the Packers defense…being “dominating”?…Dat dare is funny, i dont care who ya r!!!!…Defense is 30th..cant tackle, gets lost in coverage, receivers always seem wide open, Cant get u[p front pressure…….Yea, be POSITIVE. I positively know…without Rodgers saving this defense ass, They’d be lynched.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:23:19 +0000

MexicanpackFan

I dont think so. They seemed pretty pissed off that they gave up 38 points to the Chargers.