Comments on: James Starks Is (Unofficially) Packers No. 1 Back http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Buddymobile http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25812 Buddymobile Fri, 23 Sep 2011 04:04:51 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25812 CUT GRANT!

]]> By: BinKee http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25801 BinKee Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:17:38 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25801 Looks to me like Ryan Grant took up Brandon
Jackson’s style of running ( 2 yards and a
cloud of dust ). Too bad he can’t block as good
as Jackson, looks like we left the wrong one go

]]> By: Daybreak Doppler: Guess The Brewers Want To Clinch At Home? | PocketDoppler.com http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25773 Daybreak Doppler: Guess The Brewers Want To Clinch At Home? | PocketDoppler.com Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:16:55 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25773 [...] Total Packers on why James Starks Is (Unofficially) Packers No. 1 Back. [...]

]]> By: Chas http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25756 Chas Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:16:19 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25756 I am glad we have two good running backs. I also think that James Starks is probably the better of the two runners as of now. But set aside the money, and the papered athlete mentality. It would be harder than hell for me to be in Ryan Grants shoes right now.

]]> By: brooksnelson87 http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25731 brooksnelson87 Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:19:36 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25731 No fumbles yet; there’s one thing he’s got over Purple Jesus.

]]> By: Cody http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25730 Cody Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:16:22 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25730 Sorry damn phone autocorrected your name…

]]> By: Cody http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25729 Cody Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:15:01 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25729 Hey Monte,

Any word on Davon House? I haven’t read a lick on his injury and was wondering what the coaching staff is thinking of him…lord knows he can already cover better then Bush even without a single snap in the NFL

]]> By: Kirby http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25727 Kirby Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:53:21 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25727 He was impressive in Carolina on Sunday! The Packers have the luxury of having two great RB’s on the roster to keep opponent D###’s guessing! Gotta love it!

]]> By: Ryan http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/09/21/james-starks-is-unofficially-packers-no-1-back/#comment-25725 Ryan Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:44:23 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=11103#comment-25725 This should come as no surprise. Starks is much more explosive. If he can learn to pickup the blitz and stay healthy, he’s the #1. Also, I can’t remember him ever fumbling… But I haven’t looked at the stats.

]]>