<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodson Has No Plans To Retire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevilDon</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21524</link>
		<dc:creator>DevilDon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Vijay, I loved Reggie but nobody, I mean nobody has ever been so proficient in so many areas. I can&#039;t see the World Championship this year without him.
Obviously Tramon is one of the best and after a year of seasoning Sammy Shields can be competitive. House adds another element to a strong backfield. He doesn&#039;t need to go anywhere but where he is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Vijay, I loved Reggie but nobody, I mean nobody has ever been so proficient in so many areas. I can&#8217;t see the World Championship this year without him.<br />
Obviously Tramon is one of the best and after a year of seasoning Sammy Shields can be competitive. House adds another element to a strong backfield. He doesn&#8217;t need to go anywhere but where he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daybreak Doppler: It&#8217;s Not Over Till We Say It&#8217;s Over &#124; PocketDoppler.com</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21521</link>
		<dc:creator>Daybreak Doppler: It&#8217;s Not Over Till We Say It&#8217;s Over &#124; PocketDoppler.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I would call this good news, Woodson Has No Plans To Retire. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would call this good news, Woodson Has No Plans To Retire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21519</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 05:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Woodson, its like having another cover Corner, LB and Safety all rolled into one...best FA signing by the Packers EVER...even better than Reggie White IMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Woodson, its like having another cover Corner, LB and Safety all rolled into one&#8230;best FA signing by the Packers EVER&#8230;even better than Reggie White IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21505</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 22:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re not totally off-base. The thing is, the Packers can easily leave Woodson in the starting lineup because he&#039;s so strong against the run and is a ball hawk, they have a shutdown guy in Tramon Williams on the other side and Shields looks capable of covering a No. 2. Woodson may not be elite in coverage anymore, but he does too many other things well to take off the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not totally off-base. The thing is, the Packers can easily leave Woodson in the starting lineup because he&#8217;s so strong against the run and is a ball hawk, they have a shutdown guy in Tramon Williams on the other side and Shields looks capable of covering a No. 2. Woodson may not be elite in coverage anymore, but he does too many other things well to take off the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris k</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21494</link>
		<dc:creator>chris k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey, i had a question for ya.  who all did the packers sign/re-sign/extended from last offseason until today.      i believe i remember most of them...   cb-cw, cb-tw, s-cp, ilb-ah, ilb-db, olb-ew, nt-hg, de-jw, wr-dd (i believe he got another short extension), t-cc, and t-mt.     would that be the whole list that are still currently on the team?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, i had a question for ya.  who all did the packers sign/re-sign/extended from last offseason until today.      i believe i remember most of them&#8230;   cb-cw, cb-tw, s-cp, ilb-ah, ilb-db, olb-ew, nt-hg, de-jw, wr-dd (i believe he got another short extension), t-cc, and t-mt.     would that be the whole list that are still currently on the team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris k</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21493</link>
		<dc:creator>chris k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be interesting to see what the future hold for Charles in GB. I really like his tackling and blizting ability but lets be brutally honest... As a diehard Packer fan I have noticed his coverage skills slip just alittle bit. That being said, I think he has the chance to be a pretty good safety but the Packers have one of the tops in Nick Collins &amp; a young pup in Morgan Burnett, not to mention their backup insurance policy in Charlie Peprah...  I do think he could maintain his current role as occasional coverage DB while mostly blitzing, spying, etc for another 2 years.   I hope he stays a Packer forever and never continues with another team but can&#039;t see him as a big-money backup for longer than this.   Your thoughts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what the future hold for Charles in GB. I really like his tackling and blizting ability but lets be brutally honest&#8230; As a diehard Packer fan I have noticed his coverage skills slip just alittle bit. That being said, I think he has the chance to be a pretty good safety but the Packers have one of the tops in Nick Collins &amp; a young pup in Morgan Burnett, not to mention their backup insurance policy in Charlie Peprah&#8230;  I do think he could maintain his current role as occasional coverage DB while mostly blitzing, spying, etc for another 2 years.   I hope he stays a Packer forever and never continues with another team but can&#8217;t see him as a big-money backup for longer than this.   Your thoughts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2011/05/18/woodson-has-no-plans-to-retire/#comment-21483</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=9649#comment-21483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hell YEA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell YEA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
