Comments on: 2011 Green Bay Packers Draft Preview

By: Vijay

Vijay — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 20:02:43 +0000

I agree with Monty on this one. I study the draft more than I watch internet porn. Late first round you can always get quality starting caliber talent on the D line or O line who, with a bit of seasoning, can become what you’ve envisioned for them with a late #1. The one caveat to the Ijalana pick might be his size, but his smarts are without question. He, like Bulaga, can man either side at the tackle position and would be dominant at LG or RT when paired with Bulaga who may end up as our LT in the future. I think receiver is completely out of the question for the first pick because there are many ‘value’ in that category which will be available in the later rounds (see Vincent Brown, Shaky Smithson, Titus Young, Edmund Gates, Jeremy Kerley, Matt Szczur, Ron Johnson, Niles Paul, Greg Little, Jerrel Jernigan, Ryan Broyles to name a few…).

I also do not think that they will value an OLB prospect this high in this draft. Unless a blue chip talent slips far enough because of ‘?’of character, injury concerns, etc. they have been digging and looking at a ton of small school prospects of late. Check out Marc Schiechl from the tiny Colorado School of Mines. He’s the D-II all time sack leader. His measurables, work ethic and desire are very impressive.

By: Cody

Cody — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:44:26 +0000

If you would have written “beast” in your post one more time I was going to start ripping my hair out. Let’s get real people…with no CBA Flynn CANNOT be traded, he’ll be with the pack this year, and no way in hell does TT draft Ponder with his first pick. Have you guys looked at anyone’s big board? He’d be considered a reach no matter what in the first round. And having 4 QB’s on the same roster…just dumb. He’d instantly get moved to the practice squad and picked up by someone. I can’t guarantee a lot of things that TT does during the draft…but I guarantee he doesn’t draft Ponder at 32

By: Taryn

Taryn — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:34:22 +0000

When first starting a quest for change whether QB,OL,DL,LB of coarse you feel more dependent on the “beast” of a position which TT has gone for,got and has.IMO,though TT has reached somewhat the point of being forced into certain picks, has waned a little and developement depth is now more need than the “beast” per se,and a much oft mis-used description of players.
Drafting Ponder at 32 would make me grab my hair yes,but it would fall into my feeling of what he does now.
As for last year,the players that stepped up where by no means labeled “BEASTS” but all had “Beast” in them,which is what I would prefer over a couple called “Beasts”.
Draft for need yes,but if need is replacing depth even better as IMO is the one constant to winning.

By: Steffen

Steffen — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:17:38 +0000

Bubba, I was making fun of the perception of Ted Thompson’s draft technique and overall futility of predicting what he’ll do.
Look back at the media’s coverage of his drafts – lots of beffudlment and accusations of wackiness. Can’t argue with the results though.
And yes, Bubba, I know of and endorse (to an extent) the BPA. But accurately picking who Thompson has rated as his BPA is not so simple. Relax.

By: BubbaOne

BubbaOne — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:32:44 +0000

NITPICK: The 7th round pick is the 233rd.

Steffen: I question your describing TT’s drafting strategy as “wacky roster-building technique”. Also, saying “They say you’re not supposed to draft for need, but that’s the best way to go about this”, tells me you apparently are oblivious to a successful strategy known as taking the Best Player Available aka BPA. I do however bow to your expertise re tranny hookers.

Taryn: I do expect to hear someone TT drafts to be called a “beast”. When he drafted Finley TT arguably took the best TE that year; same w/ Sitton arguably the best OG of that draft class; same at OLB w/ CM3.

As we found out last year w/ injuries to Grant, Finley and Rodgers, we’re one hit away from saying “oh-oh”. That’s why drafting for need is shortsighted. For instance, Matt Flynn most likely is gone after this year. AR has had two concussions and Harrell is an unknown. Some think Christian Ponder will be the best NFL QB out of this draft. If TT has him rated that high it’s plausible TT could draft him at 32.
Would this shock fans anymore than in TT’s first year w/ a HOF QB, he drafted w/ the 1st pick of his tenure Aaron Rodgers? Oh yeah, how’d that work for him?

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 12:19:58 +0000

there have been rumors about sam ocho or something like that.

By: Taryn

Taryn — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:13:27 +0000

I don’t expect TT at this point to draft anyone in the “impact-start” now thinking.Core-developement-patience will dictate this year as the Packers can get severly hit in a new CBA.

Salary capped or not is a major ideology for TT and with the guys we already have…don’t hold your breath waiting for anyone called a”beast”.

By: iltarion

iltarion — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 03:08:59 +0000

The Packers proved last year that they aren’t as concerned about the OLB spot opposite Matthews as fans are. I believe they feel they can coach up cheaper players at that position. We have Brad Jones, Eric Walden, and Frank Zombo there.

I also forward that TJ Lang held up pretty well against Julius Peppers after Clifton got injured in the NFC Championship Game. I don’t think OL is a huge need either.

By: Cody

Cody — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:11:04 +0000

What I don’t understand is why everyone thinks Bulaga is going to stay at RT…I strongly believe if it were Cliffy that went down instead of Tausch, we’d be looking at Bulaga starting at LT this year. That’s his natural position, so who’s to say he won’t slide over once Cliffy goes down for good. Plus I really like what I’ve seen out of Lang…could easily replace Colledge at LG or Tausch at RT. Not too mention the team seems pretty high on Newhouse. I don’t think OL is as big of a problem as people are making it out to be.

TT’s obviously going to go for BPA, and at #32 I think there will be far better players at other positions that OL. I’m not going to complain who he drafts, I’ve learned over the years he does what he does for a reason. Also with 9 picks this year, why wouldn’t he bundle some picks and get some solid talent early…the pack don’t need 9 extra players next year trying to make the team, they’re going to have to cut enough as is. Get some solid players that could push for playing time right away, that’s my hope.

Personally I’d be happy with a receiver in the likes of Torrey Smith, Clowney, or Titus Young…all double threats. Either way I can’t wait!