Comments on: Packers Have Looked Into Atlanta Replay Situation

By: Vijay

Vijay — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:41:05 +0000

If they call a timeout, then challenge a call (and lose the challenge)…do they lose both timeouts??

By: billyschwills

billyschwills — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:44:59 +0000

Let’s just whip these Real Housewives of Atlanta and be done with this BS…i want the bears again.

By: nurseratchett

nurseratchett — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:41:57 +0000

Nicely put, hombre. Let’s hope MM is thinking progressively & aggressively this week.

Interesting to hear MM brought it up to the league-in the post game PC, he talked mostly about it just being home field advantage, yada yada yada, if I remember that particular post game PC correctly.

Regardless–we can beat this team. Hell, Vegas is only giving them 2 points, and this in their home stadium where they are supposed to be so tuff.

GO PACK GO!!!

By: ay hombre

ay hombre — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:31:07 +0000

MM actually stated that they should have called a time out the last time.

Hopefully they will use a time out to review an important play if that time out is considered expendable at that moment. That is exactly what the situation was when Gonzalez dropped that ball…a time out would not have cost us in the least, but it could have changed the entire complexion of the game in our favor too. The moment they realized the replays were running behind, there was absolutely no excuse for them to NOT call time out given the situation.

In order to be successful situationally, one must consider things in advance.