Comments on: Here’s The Packers’ Full Playoff Picture

By: Kyle

Kyle — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:45:59 +0000

cord: But I thought if there’s already 2 teams from a divison that there couldn’t be a 3rd team or is that something new this year

You're thinking of college football and the BCS.

By: nurseratchett

nurseratchett — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:54:09 +0000

How pitiful is the system if a 7-9 team (i.e., the St. Louis Lambs) not only make the playoffs but have home field? If that happens and the Pack plays in St. Louis, y’all are welcome to crash at our place. We live about 90 minutes from St. Louis. I’ve seen GB play there twice, and both times the Cheeseheads out numbered the Lambs Fans. We out drank them, too. :-)

By: nurseratchett

nurseratchett — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:51:13 +0000

I’m with you AZ!

By: cord

cord — Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:03:03 +0000

But I thought if there’s already 2 teams from a divison that there couldn’t be a 3rd team or is that something new this year

By: BoloYoung

BoloYoung — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:18:59 +0000

We can’t get screwed over by the giants again at lambeau just like in 2007. Lets get this. We really need the 12th man to be involved. Actually the bears do have something to play for….2nd seed.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:50:42 +0000

and Lovie knows that the Pack are a far better football team than his gang of underperforming, fraudulent pretenders. If he can kil the chance of seeing GB in the playoffs, you can bet your ass he’s going to take it. I’m embarrassed to be in the same division as those lucky fucks.

By: Kyle

Kyle — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:08:19 +0000

ay hombre: The Saints have a coach that wins close games…the guy we passed on. Although it sure would be nice, there’s no chance the Saints lose out. I think the NYG at +3 are just about the best betting opportunity of the year.

I don't know about that. Atlanta will still be playing for the #1 seed, and Tampa might yet be playing for their lives. I'd say the Saints losing out is a lot more likely than, say, Philadelphia (vs. MIN, vs. DAL) losing out. But yes, clearly Green Bay needs to focus on winning their own games first. I'm pretty sure they're aware of that, but we as fans have no such compulsion. Nothing we say or do affects squat. So why not dream a little?

By: AZPack

AZPack — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:11:56 +0000

Let’s just win out…

By: billyschwills

billyschwills — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:48:28 +0000

Just my opinion, but I think even if the Bears have “nothing to play for” the last week, that they still play their starters. Lovie has never been shy about making the two packer games each year the biggest games of the year…even if it means the Bears go 2-14, he has made it a point to try and beat the Pack.

It will be interesting to see how he handles it…smart money says bench your big time starters…Lovie is not smart, so it’s anyone’s guess!

By: Razstetter

Razstetter — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:45:46 +0000

The Packers are not playing very inspired football at this time ! …I’m still fuming over the Detroit game , they couldn’t have beat a high school team with the way that they played that game and then boneheaded McCarthy call a deep pass play on 4th and 1 instead of picking up the 1st down ! …WHAT A MORON !!! Then you have the special team practically give the game to the Patriots on the 71 yard kick-off return , ….hell they way they were trying to tackle they just should have let Connolly score the touchdown ! And their last drive before the final drive , they had the ball on New England’s 3 yard line and McCarthy’s only option , 2 plays at the heart of their defense , up the middle and a throw away ? Come On Now , …McCarthy needs to go and bring in someone that has some offensive football intelligence please !!!