Comments on: Giants Rolle Offers A Guarantee, But There’s Trouble In New York

By: dave

dave — Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:20:04 +0000

hey may be a hick, but he was still right

By: New York Giants Midweek Report | GiantsFootballBlog.com

New York Giants Midweek Report | GiantsFootballBlog.com — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:49:35 +0000

[...] Total Packers.com has an article quoting Antrel Rolle and stirring the pot that there is trouble in … [...]

By: Buddy's a Wisconsin Hick

Buddy's a Wisconsin Hick — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:32:06 +0000

Buddy, you GB Packin’ that a$$ full of Wisconsin chedda’ for the long winter? You should be.

By: Bringing The NFL Links: Week 15 | bringingthehouse.com

Bringing The NFL Links: Week 15 | bringingthehouse.com — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:17:48 +0000

[...] Total Packers (Green Bay Packers) - ”Giants Rolle Offers A Guarantee. But There’s Trouble In New York” [...]

By: Buddy

Buddy — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:41:09 +0000

Eli Manning held the meeting to explian how to properly fuck a Sheep’s ass. The Giants will be too busy screwing farm animals this week and we will beat thier asses.

By: iltarion

iltarion — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:42:21 +0000

In the first half of last week’s game, the Giants looked like the best team in the NFC. Eli Manning has already proven he can play in cold weather. So, this could really be a tough game on Sunday.

Home advantage will dull the Giants’ pass rush a little, same as it did in 2007. It is more difficult to rush the passer when it is cold out and you have less traction. Also to the Packers’ advantage, maybe, is that the Giants no longer have Plaxico or Amani Toomer, both of which were big WRs who performed well in the cold. With Hakeem Nicks and Mario Maningham, the Giants have probably just as good or better a WR core, but we don’t know how they will perform in really cold weather, which this game is almost guaranteed to be in.

On the negative side is the fact that the Giants are an even better running team than they were in 2007. Also, of course, the health of A-Rodge, Collins, and Jenkins are all a concern. The Packers probably need all 3 of these guys to play to have a chance. Not only do we need A-Rodge to play, but we need him better by Wednesday so that he can go through the full practice and game film schedule necessary for such a huge game. If he goes out there rusty, we are in deep shit.

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:35:48 +0000

Nope if we win out we are the 6 seed no way we can get knocked out, we control our own destiny which is all you can ask for at this point of the season. Heck we can even sneek in and pick up the 5 seed if we win out and the saints lose out, because they would lose a tiebreaker to tampa who they play week 17, and we hold the tiebreaker over tampa so that would make us 5 and tampa 6, and we’d get to play either St louis or Seattle in the first round…Pretty big longshot but that would be AWESOME!! GO PACK GO!!

By: Guysocke

Guysocke — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:05:16 +0000

Thanks for the response, Monty.

I guess what I am really looking to find out is, if the Packers win both of their games, is there any way they would still miss the playoffs?

By: Monty

Monty — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:36 +0000

I believe the Packers have to win the final two to make it as a wild card. It may be possible they can beat the Giants, lose to the Bears and still make it, but a lot of other things would need to play out that I think are even too convoluted to comprehend right now. If they lose to the Giants, the second-place team in the NFC East will get the wild card. The Saints are in line for the other spot.

By: Guysocke

Guysocke — Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:53:55 +0000

“They can also make the playoffs by winning in week 17, but they’ll need some help.”

What would need to happen in order for the Packers to get forced out despite winning their last two games? Everyone is reporting that two Packers wins gets them in, but there also seems to be a ‘but’ or ‘unless’ scenario that no one is explaining.