Comments on: Sterger Won’t Sue If NFL Suspends Favre

By: Shannon

Shannon — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:39:42 +0000

Not to mention the owner of Deadspin admitted on the webiste that in 2008, Sterger did work for them while with the Jets. He had “forgotten” she had worked for them.

Funny how she also conveniently forgot about doing work for them. Why is that, I wonder? So for her to say she didn’t know DeLaurio would run the story when she told him is ludicrous. She worked for them and knew what kind of website they are.

I can’t feel sorry for this girl. She never claimed it was sexual harassment when it happened. And waited over 2 years to say anything about it. She even admitted to keeping the pics to laugh about with friends. That doesn’t make sense to me at all. If you’re being sexual harrassed, you don’t keep the pics to laugh at. You either report it or delete the pics and change your phone number. She did neither. In fact, she’s not the one who instigated the investigation. The NFL did that on their own. Now she says she wants Favre punished? If she’d wanted him punished, I wouldn’t think you’d wait 2 years to try to get him punished. That doesn’t make sense to me. And why stall when it came to meeting with the NFL? Her manager kept saying she was considering meeting with them and then she wouldn’t. That went on for weeks.

By: Favre Camp: Bring On A Lawsuit | Total Packers

Favre Camp: Bring On A Lawsuit | Total Packers — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:54:06 +0000

[...] response to the latest from Jenn Sterger’s camp — that they’ll file a lawsuit if the NFL doesn’t suspend Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre for violating the [...]

By: jeremy

jeremy — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:17:39 +0000

Puritanical
1. Usually disparaging strict in moral or religious outlook, esp in shunning sensual pleasures.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com

Calling someone a whore because she got a boob job and did a photoshoot with Maxim falls right under that definition. It appears you are the one with a limited vocabulary there tiny tim.

By: Taryn

Taryn — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:31:05 +0000

Incredible. She won’t sue if the NFL suspends Favre and makes him go to a program where they will train him to never(100%) pull his weiner out of his pants again.
This is the lamest shit ever.

By: Abe Frohman

Abe Frohman — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:11:05 +0000

If she does choose to file a lawsuit, anything she says now may damage her case. THAT is why she’s not saying anything.

I fail to comprehend why taking an agnostic approach to the alleged facts in all this makes her a whore and us hate Favre. Obviously your mind is made up – predominately based upon circumstancial evidence – and you’re welcome to your opinion, however uninformed it may be.

By: jeremy

jeremy — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:30:21 +0000

Given the number of people who think like you out there, I’m not really having difficulties figuring out why she wants to clear her name.

By: Kozak

Kozak — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:00:20 +0000

and of course Bawny Fwanks

By: Kozak

Kozak — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:59:13 +0000

Lets be bipartisan here. Don’t forget such slime as Bill Clinton, Mel Reynolds, Brock Adams, John Edwards, Daniel Inouye, and Eliot Spitzer.

By: tim

tim — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:49:01 +0000

What’s puritanical about it?
And why are you concerning yourself with your assumptions of his ‘unrealized suppressed sexual urges”?

I’m guessing you don’t know what ‘puritanical’ means and that you have something suppressed issue going on which explains your detacted response.

By: Madcity Packer Fan

Madcity Packer Fan — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:30:55 +0000

I think she is a nice girl. By nice I mean everything under her clothing. Who cares! She is hot and Favre is a perv..the end.