Comments on: Predictions: Packers vs. 49ers

By: Buddy

Buddy — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:35:58 +0000

Ay Hombre, sounds like you need a glass of shut the fuck up. You are Packer hating which makes you an ass. Don’t come into my house and talk smack about the Pack. Go beat you dick somewhere else fucking traitor!

By: iltarion

iltarion — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:55:58 +0000

Yeah, I watched the game like 3 times. It was 9-0. That’s what average WRs do, drop balls.

The Pack just played Atlanta. It was an OT game, even with it at Atlanta and Atlanta getting A-Rodge’s only fumble of the season. That makes Atlanta twice the team the Packers are? Okay, MIke Smith, whatever you say.

By: ay hombre

ay hombre — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:00:22 +0000

Atlanta knows how to win against good teams. I’m sorry…but they are twice the team the Packers are and will beat them in the playoffs…assuming the Packers even make it that far. The Packers beat the Jets….big fucking deal. Did you even watch that game? Two ints that weren’t, Jets dropping passes all over and a whopping 3 field goals of offense. Yeah…if that’s a signature win then we may as well call it a year.

Come talk to me after McCarthy fucks up against New England and the Bears and then you can give me your ‘coach of the year’ speech. Coach of the Year versus shit teams maybe….but that be it.

By: iltarion

iltarion — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:26:47 +0000

MM is a Coach of the Year candidate. Hate to break it to you. The “haven’t beat a team with so-and-so record” is the real horseshit. Remember when everyone was saying that about the Bears? I bet you were one of them.

Nice list of excuses for why we beat a 9-2 team at their house when they were off a bye. They scored ZERO effin points. You need a lot more excuses to explain that.

Maybe the 5-7 Vikings are below .500 because we beat them twice. Maybe.

Vick played nearly 3 quarters of that game, and the score was closer at half time then the final score was with Vick playing the whole 2nd half. Probably conveniently forgot about that.

Plus, it isn’t just like the Packers squeeze by the weaker teams. The Packers have crushed them, excepting the Lions who are a division opponent so shit happens.

The Packers are 8-4 and have played two 9-2 teams and a 9-3 team in their building. They lead the NFL in scoring differential. This is one of the best teams in the NFL. Quit the irrational MM hate and get on the bandwagon before it is too late.

By: ay hombre

ay hombre — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:39:06 +0000

We better come out rockin’ because our season is on the line. We’ve only beat one team with a winning record all year and that was a rusty Jets team that had every call go against them the entire game and dropped every pass.

The Eagles with Kevin Kolb as the starter are NOT a winning football team.

Take every other game that we lost to winning teams and that’s where the excuses start to come into play. Ohh…we should have won. Oh…we could have won. Oh…the other team made one more play than we made. I’m fucking sick of it.

We’ll win today because we’re playing a shit team, we’ll barely beat the Lions and then we’ll proceed to lose every other game.

Our coaches are the difference in us losing close games and I don’t suspect that will change anytime under our current coaching regime.

Packers 27 49ers 20….and it don’t mean shit.

By: Cade Lawson

Cade Lawson — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:01:48 +0000

Packers 28 49ers 6

By: Crash

Crash — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 05:58:40 +0000

I lol’d at Monty’s comment. Saving the best for last is really underrated.

By: Bogmon

Bogmon — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:54:28 +0000

I’m with Monty on this one.

(said in the voice of SuperFan)

Packersz 84 49ersz negative 3

By: DevilDon

DevilDon — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:10:49 +0000

If Joe Nedney can’t play there will be no field goals from the 49ers, I am predicting 31-7