<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barnett Could Be Out For The Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayV#7</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10659</link>
		<dc:creator>RayV#7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FFFFUUUUCCCCKKKK!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFFFUUUUCCCCKKKK!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10652</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little overly simplistic, as by that logic, teams that lead ToP would never see defensive injuries which is simply not true.

However, part of your point IS true in that the Packers are 19th in the NFL in ToP, and 23rd in # of offensive plays from scrimmage.

However, the Steelers, Jets, Chiefs and Pats are all also near us in the bottom half of the league in time of posession as well.  It&#039;s simply intellectually irresponsible to point to a single stat and say that that is why anything is happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little overly simplistic, as by that logic, teams that lead ToP would never see defensive injuries which is simply not true.</p>
<p>However, part of your point IS true in that the Packers are 19th in the NFL in ToP, and 23rd in # of offensive plays from scrimmage.</p>
<p>However, the Steelers, Jets, Chiefs and Pats are all also near us in the bottom half of the league in time of posession as well.  It&#8217;s simply intellectually irresponsible to point to a single stat and say that that is why anything is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10635</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else see a theme here? The reason why we have so many defensive injuries is because our D starters see extended periods of time on the field and more snaps than any of us would like. The best and simplest way to negate that is to alter time of possession on the offensive side of the ball. And the best way to improve time of possession? YOU GOT IT! An effective RUN GAME.
Nuff said! Thanks Ted!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else see a theme here? The reason why we have so many defensive injuries is because our D starters see extended periods of time on the field and more snaps than any of us would like. The best and simplest way to negate that is to alter time of possession on the offensive side of the ball. And the best way to improve time of possession? YOU GOT IT! An effective RUN GAME.<br />
Nuff said! Thanks Ted!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cade Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10634</link>
		<dc:creator>Cade Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....... *sigh* Again? What&#039;s new?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;. *sigh* Again? What&#8217;s new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Appleseed</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10629</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Appleseed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just getting ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just getting ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/10/06/barnett-could-be-out-for-the-season/#comment-10627</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=6631#comment-10627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, shit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
