Comments on: Rod Woodson: No Respect For Favre

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:24:33 +0000

That is such a sack of shit. there are probably less than a handful of people outside of this page who believe that. Anyone who watches favre knows he doesn’t need the money he already has, let alone to subject himself to playing just for money. Favre plays because its what he has done his whole life. If someone wants to hire him and yes, pay him, what’s it to you? When was the last time ANYONE wanted your skills????

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:21:48 +0000

Rod has enough brain damage that he can’t think beyond animal instincts. He knows Favre is still the Alpha male and he can’t stand it.

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:19:22 +0000

written at at least five grade levels above any one here’s reading level.

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:17:28 +0000

Find me another blog as foul as this and I’ll show you raider fans. You guys aren’t Green bay fans. You are too hateful and stupid.

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:15:42 +0000

This is a real class organization. You guys are homophobic, misogynistic haters.

You like to use butt sex as an insult, references to female anatomy, can you even think above the waist?

You further sicken die hard Packer fans (like the ones who knew Vince Lombardi) with your excessive need to bash a man whose big mistake was having trouble deciding about his future.

You ought to be able to express your THOUGHTS without sexual references, these don’t count as worthy of publication. I am still stunned you have a moderater. What? If you don’t bash Favre and his fans with sexual, hate crime phrases, you can’t get published? What a joke!

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:03:15 +0000

You mean like when Peyton Manning screams at his coach on the sidelines? or when favre shrugged when he did not agree with Childress? It’s a game. Elite players don’t agree with coaches. Big deal. favre never makes a specitical of it, unlike Peyton and Brady.

By: DRPSYCH

DRPSYCH — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:58:26 +0000

Favre was not medically released by training camp. None of his receiving corps was in training camp because most of them were not Vikings yet. So what? Who cares what employers ask of their employees???

Hey, Beard. Where do you get your info? Mine says Favre lights up the locker room and gives it a much better, winning mood than every day. Every player in there wants to be able to tell their kids and grandkids they played with the great Favre.

So, Favre struggles with big decisions about playing. He doesn’t hesitate on the field like AR (sacked the most of any QB).

Did I wander into an actual Packers site whose sole perpose is to bash one of the Legends of Lambeau? You guys are sick. If you are over him you would not bother to take time to hate him.

By: jeff ircink

jeff ircink — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:27:29 +0000

alright. let me think about it. i’ve got a staged play reading coming up at the end of Sept that i’m prepping for so i will say this won’t happen until after Oct. 1.

also, i will NOT agree to, let’s say i’m the “winner”, is you never commenting on TotalPackers.com. you’re a Packer fan. i won’t be responsible for forcing you off this site just cause of some contest. i don’t know what the stakes will be – but not that.

By: billyschwills

billyschwills — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:12 +0000

I would like you to pick the rules, the criteria, the JUDGES, and name the stakes. Mostly what I am trying to protect against is any sour grapes after the fact.

I guess a play isn’t something I have written before, so I would prefer anything else, but I am giving you free reign to decide the stakes, make the rules, pick the judges, and then follow through. I don’t think either of us wants to commit hundreds of hours to an internet argument/bet, so let’s make this doable.

I would say the stakes could be something like: Loser never comments on Total Packers blog again, with a gentleman’s agreement that we do not make up a second profile to use in the future. Again though, you pick the stakes, make the rules, and let me know. If you are so confident that I cannot “write my way out of a condom”, I look forward to smoking you like last week’s hashish.

Since you are a professional and a literary hobbyist, this should be a piece of cake for you, and I look forward to this.

By: jeff ircink

jeff ircink — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:34:23 +0000

billyschwills. i accept. I PICK the criteria? wouldn’t that be unfair? shouldn’t it be random? i could say, write a short, funny play on anything you want. you men you’d agree to that?

wait – you know what. stop with bag of jizz bullshit, ok. you wanna accept a challenge to write, then the first criteria is no namecalling. not that i can’t take, it’s just getting overdone and i’m sick of it, ok?

criteria. anything? you really want ME to pick anything?