Comments on: Aaron Rodgers Played With Substantial Injuries

By: matt fox

matt fox — Wed, 19 May 2010 05:09:02 +0000

First of Joel, I’d just like to say that who’s fault is it that Aaron Rodgers got the beating he did? Who hasn’t built a decent O-line since he came in to the organization? In FIVE years?! Who’s probably going to break our qb in half before long? Ted Thompson.
Now, back to your question. Favre DID take a beating that badly, worse actually, in 06, when more than half the Packers on the squad were injured and TT did not sign any FAs for depth. Favre just got murdered that year and he was 37 or something. Much worse than Rodgers last year. So yes. I do think Favre couldve have taken the hits. He’s Iron Man.

By: joel

joel — Tue, 18 May 2010 20:31:34 +0000

if you ask me, which nobody really did, i’d say the most interesting question about all this is, at favre’s age, could he have taken the hits he probably would have taken if he were behind center for the pack last year? sure, he might not have held onto the ball as long, but he probably would have also launch a few more INTs.

By: Kozak

Kozak — Tue, 18 May 2010 17:32:20 +0000

Considering the beating Rodgers took in the first half of the season (37 in the first 8 games) it’s amazing he’s still able to walk..

By: Matt Fox

Matt Fox — Mon, 17 May 2010 21:40:07 +0000

And for the record, I like Aaron Rodgers. I liked Aaron Rodgers when he played at Cal, and when he was Favres backup for 4 years and some people were down on him. A-rod aint da problem. Its the two jackasses running the show that need to go.

By: Matt Fox

Matt Fox — Mon, 17 May 2010 21:38:15 +0000

You have said absolutely nothing of substance in your in depth analysis of why my logic is flawed, except to go fuck myself. Are you fucking retarded?

By: Bryan Bulaga Is Pretty Strong | Total Packers

Bryan Bulaga Is Pretty Strong | Total Packers — Mon, 17 May 2010 20:01:36 +0000

[...] Packers’ offensive line break down last season — something that likely contributed to Rodgers’ recently-reported injuries. Bulaga is considered the eventual successor to Chad Clifton at left [...]

By: chitter

chitter — Mon, 17 May 2010 16:41:46 +0000

Hey Matt Fox. First of all….go fuck yourself. Second of all….nice logic.

You’re such a fucking moron. If I wanted to argue with the likes of someone as dumb as you I would first have to go get lobotomized leaving myself with roughly 3% of my current brain power, whereby I would still be a 3-1 favorite to kick your worthless ass in any form of debate.

By your argument and your demented sense of logic, I’ll just say Brett Favre is a worse quarterback than Aaron Rodgers because he’s thrown more career interceptions.

You’re worthless, Matt Fox. I put the over/under on your IQ at 65.

By: Matt Fox

Matt Fox — Mon, 17 May 2010 10:32:43 +0000

Yes, in two seasons of not winning a playoff game Aaron Rodgers is better than Brett Favre. Nice observation there buddy.

By: Lol

Lol — Sun, 16 May 2010 23:15:40 +0000

So basically, Brett Favre is the Arnold Terminator, and Aaron Rodgers is the T-1000 liquid kick arse terminator.