<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Neal: Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:42:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/#comment-5757</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=5273#comment-5757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[isn&#039;t every draft pick a &quot;project&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t every draft pick a &#8220;project&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoop</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=5273#comment-5732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing that throws the whole who had who rated where is the difference in what is looked for in prospects as 4-3 DE, 4-3 3 technique and 4-3 DT and 3-4 DE in this instance.

And then also add in what Capers looks for and wants from a 3-4 DE.
Neal fits that VERY well.  His agility, his strength and his quickness all make him a TOP prospect for a 3-4 DE.

Just go and compare his testing numbers to Suh, McCoy, Odrick and then look at that he did not come out of games.
Look at what Purdue asked him to do.

Now go and look at the other 3-4 teams in the NFL and where they drafted players that the so called experts had rated much lower. 
Neal is not an anomaly, he just shows the difference in what 3-4 teams look for and rate higher for there different needs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that throws the whole who had who rated where is the difference in what is looked for in prospects as 4-3 DE, 4-3 3 technique and 4-3 DT and 3-4 DE in this instance.</p>
<p>And then also add in what Capers looks for and wants from a 3-4 DE.<br />
Neal fits that VERY well.  His agility, his strength and his quickness all make him a TOP prospect for a 3-4 DE.</p>
<p>Just go and compare his testing numbers to Suh, McCoy, Odrick and then look at that he did not come out of games.<br />
Look at what Purdue asked him to do.</p>
<p>Now go and look at the other 3-4 teams in the NFL and where they drafted players that the so called experts had rated much lower.<br />
Neal is not an anomaly, he just shows the difference in what 3-4 teams look for and rate higher for there different needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/#comment-5556</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 22:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=5273#comment-5556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know we all wanted an OLB in round two but after Neal was drafted no one took a 3-4 OLB prospect until Gibson went in round 4. 

I have to seriously question Wes Buntings analysis here. Thompson has repeatedly stated he almost never moves guys up based on combine numbers. 

 TT quotes about changing the board based on the combine from Bob McGinn&#039;s article.

&quot;By the time you get to the draft, those names go back to the original place they were before we came to the combine,&quot; Thompson said. &quot;I swear it happens.

&quot;You go back and watch the tape and say, &#039;You know what? We&#039;re nuts.&#039;

&quot;So, as much as we can, we try to lean on the football stuff and say, &#039;Is he a good player? Does he like to play the game?&#039;

&quot;If he can do those things, he has a chance to be a Packer.&quot;

Of course I don&#039;t agree with TT ignoring FA and trades as a way to improve the team. I don&#039;t like all of the guys he drafts, but Bunting is just making stuff up here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know we all wanted an OLB in round two but after Neal was drafted no one took a 3-4 OLB prospect until Gibson went in round 4. </p>
<p>I have to seriously question Wes Buntings analysis here. Thompson has repeatedly stated he almost never moves guys up based on combine numbers. </p>
<p> TT quotes about changing the board based on the combine from Bob McGinn&#8217;s article.</p>
<p>&#8220;By the time you get to the draft, those names go back to the original place they were before we came to the combine,&#8221; Thompson said. &#8220;I swear it happens.</p>
<p>&#8220;You go back and watch the tape and say, &#8216;You know what? We&#8217;re nuts.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;So, as much as we can, we try to lean on the football stuff and say, &#8216;Is he a good player? Does he like to play the game?&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;If he can do those things, he has a chance to be a Packer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course I don&#8217;t agree with TT ignoring FA and trades as a way to improve the team. I don&#8217;t like all of the guys he drafts, but Bunting is just making stuff up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubicon</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/#comment-5541</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubicon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=5273#comment-5541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, his draft stock went up in the weeks prior to the draft, so I think you&#039;re information is very dated.  Neal was the best DE available at the time, and if TT decided to wait to pick him with the way DE&#039;s were flying off the board I doubt he would have been available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, his draft stock went up in the weeks prior to the draft, so I think you&#8217;re information is very dated.  Neal was the best DE available at the time, and if TT decided to wait to pick him with the way DE&#8217;s were flying off the board I doubt he would have been available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubicon</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/05/06/mike-neal-project/#comment-5540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubicon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=5273#comment-5540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re correct..It is just an opinion.  I&#039;m certain TT knows significantly more than any reporter about evaluating talent and the needs of the team...So the fact that you happened to be dumbfounded has no significance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re correct..It is just an opinion.  I&#8217;m certain TT knows significantly more than any reporter about evaluating talent and the needs of the team&#8230;So the fact that you happened to be dumbfounded has no significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
