Comments on: A.J. Hawk To Remain With Packers, But At What Price? http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/ Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is Tue, 21 May 2013 04:03:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: A.J. Hawk, You're Cut! | Total Packers http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-42491 A.J. Hawk, You're Cut! | Total Packers Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:44:06 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-42491 [...] We’ve never thought much of Green Bay Packers linebacker A.J. Hawk. In fact, we’ve called him a bust in the past. [...]

]]> By: Chitter http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2882 Chitter Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:58:06 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2882 Wow! Ladies and gentlemen….Mr. AJ Hawk! It’s pretty obvious AJ that you have created 3 different screen names in order to give the appearance that there are actually 3 different Packers fans that think you’re worth keeping. Hey AJ….we’re not fooled.

]]> By: Jared http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2881 Jared Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:55:35 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2881 Although I am NOT a Hawk fan, I wouldn’t be so quick to through TT under the bus. He was declared by MANY as the safest pick in the draft, because everyone thought he would be a solid NFL player. For some reason, it hasn’t panned out in Green Bay. He’s not a Mandarich/Harrell type of “bust” because he can play in the NFL and he could easily start on any number of NFL teams, it’s just that we have sooooo many good LBs that he is just the odd man out. It’s a good problem to have, IMO. I say we cut our losses and go and find a playmaking safety or a stud OT (not that any other team would part with either).

]]> By: Packer Dude http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2876 Packer Dude Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:16:31 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2876 The entire packers D stinks except for Woodson, Jolly and Harris. Number 1 in the NFL? ROFL. More like number 1 in suckiness. Stats don’t count for anything unless u win. Hawk was #2 for the pack? that shows how bad the pack d is. TT and MM are idiots that need to go. Hawk 4.6 mil? chillar 4 mill? Where do I sign up to play for the pack and miss tons of coverages and tackles and take poor angles? So are fans that think the D is average, good or great. Hawk is worthy of a 5th round pick. I’d take Hunter Hillensmeyer over Hawk. Hunter is way better than Hawk. We had Hunter too.

]]> By: ken http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2874 ken Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:39:10 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2874 Hawk is a beast.I dont understand ur negative thoughts?I believe you will eat your words this year.Hawk is better then broken barnett.talk about make some cap room.!

]]> By: Jackson http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2871 Jackson Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:29:41 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2871 While Hawk didn’t turn out to be the player we were so excited to draft, I think is an important part of the team as far as knowing his role…..I would rather keep him for the money they pay him than sign some linebacker in free agency…..Teams that stay together – the Colts are a good example of this – end up playing well together……trust in your teammates is a big part in the NFL…..Also, take into account that after next season, there may not be football for a while due to labor issues…..signing a free agent to a 2 or 3 year deal right now makes little sense…..

]]> By: Middleman http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2870 Middleman Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:04:33 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2870 We’re having trouble understanding this Hawk-bashing in a corner of Packerland not to mention, a lack of the right information.
Gentlemen, where’s this coming from?? the $4.6 mil? All you have to do is look at the ’09′ stats and this point about trading Hawk is foolish!
He’s second in team tackles & assists of the front 7; his stats on tackles & stuffs are in the top three in company with the NFL’s Def. player of the year; and is the only LB w/ any INT’s, and his 16 games, we all believe, had SOMETHING to do w/ a defense that was rated in the top 5, and finally #1 for the 2009 NFL season…the entire league, gentlemen, the best rated defense in the league.

Our weaknesses that cost us, had a awholelotmore to do w/ the DB dropoff than the LB’s. The stats speak for themselves.

]]> By: tequila http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2869 tequila Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:36:20 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2869 Cut that man, get me another Al Harris.

]]> By: John Krueger http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2868 John Krueger Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:12:17 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2868 I agree completely. I’ve seen him miss coverage, miss tackles.
He’s small and slow.

]]> By: Sarah http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/02/10/a-j-hawk-to-remain-with-the-packers-but-at-what-price/#comment-2865 Sarah Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:25:23 +0000 http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3591#comment-2865 A-freakin-men.

]]>