<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Season-Ending Facemask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/</link>
	<description>Your Green Bay Packers: Telling It Like It Is</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packers Saved the Sports Book &#124; Total Packers</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>Packers Saved the Sports Book &#124; Total Packers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have questioned why a facemask wasn&#8217;t called on the play that ended the game, or a personal foul wasn&#8217;t called on the helmet-to-helmet hit [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have questioned why a facemask wasn&#8217;t called on the play that ended the game, or a personal foul wasn&#8217;t called on the helmet-to-helmet hit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Halvorson</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Halvorson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to NFL.com, had the penalty been called, it still would have been cardinals ball, just not a touchdown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to NFL.com, had the penalty been called, it still would have been cardinals ball, just not a touchdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chitter</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Chitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s an excerpt:

NFL Notebook: Arizona win resuscitates sports books
(January 12, 2010 7:09 AM) - 

NFL Notebook by Micah Roberts &#124; 

There haven’t been ooh’s and aah’s in Las Vegas sports books all season like what was witnessed by the thousands who saw Sunday’s Packers-Cardinals Wild Card matchup. The game resembled like Arena Football league type of game with non-stop action, surely not an NFL game, at least by the standards set from the three previous uneventful Wild Card games over the weekend.

However, unlike the old Arena league games, this game was the most heavily bet game of the weekend.

Usually, the final game of the playoff weekend always has the most wagers just because of all the repeat wagers after the other games are over. Sometimes, their winning bets from earlier games are rolling over from someone feeling lucky, or sometimes it’s the unlucky who are trying to recoup their losses from the other games.

By Friday of last week, before any of the games started, several sports books were already reporting that the Cardinals game had the most action of the four games by far – both from the Sharps and small money. The ticket count ratio was 6 to 1 at many books in favor of the Packers and the actual cash wagers resembled the same ratio.

When the opening line came out last Sunday night, many opened the game with the Cardinals a 3 (EVEN) or 2½-point favorite. That number continued to slide down all week until finally making the Packers a 1-point or 2-point favorite by Thursday. By kickoff on Sunday, most books closed with the Packers as a 3-point favorite – a 6-point swing in many cases.

Everyone had Packers fever. The public had just witnessed the same game last week in Arizona with Green Bay winning easily 33-7, despite the Cardinals not playing many of their starters. They had just seen the Jets dispose of the Bengals like they did last week and the same with the Cowboys thumping the Eagles again … so, why not the Packers, too.

The Packers offense had been so crisp the last few weeks led by Aaron Rodgers and the defense had been almost equally as strong.

The variable missing from the Cardinals loss last week was Kurt Warner, who played one of the best games of his dazzling career leading Arizona to the 51-45 overtime win. Talk all week had been about how Warner said he may retire at the end of the season, a hope all the Packer-backers wished he had done before the game.

At the conclusion of the game, everyone had to catch their breath from the frenzied pace of the game, and the cashier windows in the sports books looked more like a Tuesday morning during basketball season than an NFL Sunday.

The sports books’ entire weekend rested on that one Packers decision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p>NFL Notebook: Arizona win resuscitates sports books<br />
(January 12, 2010 7:09 AM) &#8211; </p>
<p>NFL Notebook by Micah Roberts | </p>
<p>There haven’t been ooh’s and aah’s in Las Vegas sports books all season like what was witnessed by the thousands who saw Sunday’s Packers-Cardinals Wild Card matchup. The game resembled like Arena Football league type of game with non-stop action, surely not an NFL game, at least by the standards set from the three previous uneventful Wild Card games over the weekend.</p>
<p>However, unlike the old Arena league games, this game was the most heavily bet game of the weekend.</p>
<p>Usually, the final game of the playoff weekend always has the most wagers just because of all the repeat wagers after the other games are over. Sometimes, their winning bets from earlier games are rolling over from someone feeling lucky, or sometimes it’s the unlucky who are trying to recoup their losses from the other games.</p>
<p>By Friday of last week, before any of the games started, several sports books were already reporting that the Cardinals game had the most action of the four games by far – both from the Sharps and small money. The ticket count ratio was 6 to 1 at many books in favor of the Packers and the actual cash wagers resembled the same ratio.</p>
<p>When the opening line came out last Sunday night, many opened the game with the Cardinals a 3 (EVEN) or 2½-point favorite. That number continued to slide down all week until finally making the Packers a 1-point or 2-point favorite by Thursday. By kickoff on Sunday, most books closed with the Packers as a 3-point favorite – a 6-point swing in many cases.</p>
<p>Everyone had Packers fever. The public had just witnessed the same game last week in Arizona with Green Bay winning easily 33-7, despite the Cardinals not playing many of their starters. They had just seen the Jets dispose of the Bengals like they did last week and the same with the Cowboys thumping the Eagles again … so, why not the Packers, too.</p>
<p>The Packers offense had been so crisp the last few weeks led by Aaron Rodgers and the defense had been almost equally as strong.</p>
<p>The variable missing from the Cardinals loss last week was Kurt Warner, who played one of the best games of his dazzling career leading Arizona to the 51-45 overtime win. Talk all week had been about how Warner said he may retire at the end of the season, a hope all the Packer-backers wished he had done before the game.</p>
<p>At the conclusion of the game, everyone had to catch their breath from the frenzied pace of the game, and the cashier windows in the sports books looked more like a Tuesday morning during basketball season than an NFL Sunday.</p>
<p>The sports books’ entire weekend rested on that one Packers decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chitter</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>Chitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[READ THIS STORY IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS ABOUT WHY ARIZONA GOT ALL THE CALLS. 

http://www.gamingtoday.com/race-sports/story.bv?storyid=24250]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>READ THIS STORY IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS ABOUT WHY ARIZONA GOT ALL THE CALLS. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gamingtoday.com/race-sports/story.bv?storyid=24250" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamingtoday.com/race-sports/story.bv?storyid=24250</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am indeed a die hard packer fan and fact is we lost.  Cant blame the defense to much, Warner is a HOF QB and he had an awesome game.  However I called that facemask when it happened and than the next day i watched the replay on ESPN and you can see the ref right there, LOOKING RIGHT AT RODGERS!  I honestly believe the better team lost on Sunday, all bias aside.  Them refs should never ref another game, in fact should have some charges filed against them.  You are paid to ref a game, probably one of the easiest jobs there is, there is no excuse for that many missed calls.  Either way whats done is done, I can&#039;t wait til next year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am indeed a die hard packer fan and fact is we lost.  Cant blame the defense to much, Warner is a HOF QB and he had an awesome game.  However I called that facemask when it happened and than the next day i watched the replay on ESPN and you can see the ref right there, LOOKING RIGHT AT RODGERS!  I honestly believe the better team lost on Sunday, all bias aside.  Them refs should never ref another game, in fact should have some charges filed against them.  You are paid to ref a game, probably one of the easiest jobs there is, there is no excuse for that many missed calls.  Either way whats done is done, I can&#8217;t wait til next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call it anything you want as often as you will, but it all comes out the same way---THE PACKERS GOT SCREWED!!!. Hope the Saints eat the Cardinals&#039; lunch and chuck it all over &#039;em.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call it anything you want as often as you will, but it all comes out the same way&#8212;THE PACKERS GOT SCREWED!!!. Hope the Saints eat the Cardinals&#8217; lunch and chuck it all over &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The game would have been fair if the refs had been letting GB get away with all the stuff AZ did. Seriously, watch the calls against Woodson for pass int. and then watch Fitzgerald blatantly push Woodson to the ground more than 10 yards from the line of scrimmage and score a TD. That TD should not have happened, period. Prove to me using logic and reason that that play, and in addition the facemask at the end, were not game changing blunders by the refs . I dare you. GB won the game fair and square and refs gave it to AZ, who played well, but didn&#039;t deserve the W. End of story. And by the way, Packers fans don&#039;t care about this game cause we&#039;ve known all season it&#039;ll take another 2 years before the league&#039;s youngest team is ready for the super bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game would have been fair if the refs had been letting GB get away with all the stuff AZ did. Seriously, watch the calls against Woodson for pass int. and then watch Fitzgerald blatantly push Woodson to the ground more than 10 yards from the line of scrimmage and score a TD. That TD should not have happened, period. Prove to me using logic and reason that that play, and in addition the facemask at the end, were not game changing blunders by the refs . I dare you. GB won the game fair and square and refs gave it to AZ, who played well, but didn&#8217;t deserve the W. End of story. And by the way, Packers fans don&#8217;t care about this game cause we&#8217;ve known all season it&#8217;ll take another 2 years before the league&#8217;s youngest team is ready for the super bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Football NFL &#187; Packers-Cardinals: Kurt Warner, Poor Officiating Ends Green Bay&#8217;s Season</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>American Football NFL &#187; Packers-Cardinals: Kurt Warner, Poor Officiating Ends Green Bay&#8217;s Season</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is a good link to a shot of the missed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a good link to a shot of the missed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GBFan...Exactly what I was thinking. Sure the Packers D gave up a lot of points, way too many, but so did the Cardinals. People always say the Packers didn&#039;t deserve to win,it shouldn&#039;t have came down to that play, if they were better it wouldn&#039;t have gone to OT, blah blah blah. But the Cardinals gave up just as many going into that horrible call, so why do the Cardinals deserve to win, and the Packers don&#039;t. Horrible call.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GBFan&#8230;Exactly what I was thinking. Sure the Packers D gave up a lot of points, way too many, but so did the Cardinals. People always say the Packers didn&#8217;t deserve to win,it shouldn&#8217;t have came down to that play, if they were better it wouldn&#8217;t have gone to OT, blah blah blah. But the Cardinals gave up just as many going into that horrible call, so why do the Cardinals deserve to win, and the Packers don&#8217;t. Horrible call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.totalpackers.com/2010/01/11/the-season-ending-facemask/#comment-2419</link>
		<dc:creator>Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalpackers.com/?p=3375#comment-2419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lotsa chit chat here but I have yet to see ( hear ) any &quot;crying&quot;  nor any &quot;sour grapes&quot; Rick Serva.  

Should there have been a F M  call ?  Yeah, probably but there wasn&#039;t.  There were several other missed calls too.  Fact is K W had his way with the Pack&#039;s pass D THAT&#039;S what won them the game. I&#039;m a bigtime Packer fan but that&#039;s the way it goes.  Whoever said the Pack blew it on the first two turn overs was probably right. The Pack couldn&#039;t get it done is all there is to it.  

Can&#039;t believe I&#039;m saying this but GO BRETT &amp; the VIKES !

Bite your tongue Norton, bite your tongue .....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lotsa chit chat here but I have yet to see ( hear ) any &#8220;crying&#8221;  nor any &#8220;sour grapes&#8221; Rick Serva.  </p>
<p>Should there have been a F M  call ?  Yeah, probably but there wasn&#8217;t.  There were several other missed calls too.  Fact is K W had his way with the Pack&#8217;s pass D THAT&#8217;S what won them the game. I&#8217;m a bigtime Packer fan but that&#8217;s the way it goes.  Whoever said the Pack blew it on the first two turn overs was probably right. The Pack couldn&#8217;t get it done is all there is to it.  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m saying this but GO BRETT &amp; the VIKES !</p>
<p>Bite your tongue Norton, bite your tongue &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
